SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Magnetics Corp -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jonathan Bird who wrote (10364)11/15/1997 7:00:00 PM
From: Brian Lempel  Respond to of 12298
 
Jon, I think that most of APM's MR head R & D has been done. Now they just have to convert their fabs to produce it in volume. Any R&D spending now will be for next generation of MR and/or GMR.

Brian



To: Jonathan Bird who wrote (10364)11/15/1997 10:03:00 PM
From: Thomas George Warner  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12298
 
I do not want to sound negative on your post but you are making a lot of unsubstantiated statements, some of which contain the phrase " I don't know", hardly a basis for educated investing. If you would take the time to do a little basic research you would find that a comparison of the fundamentals of APM and RDRT over the past 5 years tells a definite story. Contrary to what you post, the future very often mirrors the past. Consistency in management and technology is what counts in investing.

As to your statement about R&D, normally others things being equal the companies putting a large percentage of their sales into R&D will grow faster and corner market technology advances. Good investors always look for technology stocks that invest a minimum of 7% of sales into R&D. See BAY- 10.5%, CS 11.5%, CSCO 11%, COMS 11% ETC. If you want to make money consistently than you have to do the research, anything less is guessing.

Good investing