Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Yousef who wrote (2184)	11/15/1997 9:29:00 PM
From: Xpiderman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6843

Intel Road Map: A Pentium II For All Systems - Intel wants it all. by Mark Hachman Posted 6:00 p.m., November 14, 1997 No longer satisfied with the high end of the computer market, and determined to fend off competitors on the low end, the chip manufacturer has come up with a plan to flood the desktop-computer market with Pentium II processors, confidential company road maps show. From the fastest, most expensive servers to the most humble sub-$1,000 PC, Intel will price the Pentium II to move. And by September 1998, the company expects to have versions of its flagship chip that fit the budget of every desktop designer on earth. At the top of the line will be a 400-MHz processor featuring ECC L2 cache with a May 1998 price of $851 in 1,000-unit lots. At the bottom rung, there's a 233-MHz chip with non-ECC cache for $209. A spokeswoman for Santa Clara, Calif.-based Intel declined to confirm either the prices or the chip introductions, which were detailed in documents circulated to computer manufacturers and distributors late last month. However, she did say the company "intends for the Pentium II to become ubiquitous, and our pricing will reflect that." Intel's new agenda first came to light a little more than a week ago, when its top officials briefed analysts at a meeting about a "horizontal" marketing program. Rather than simply make new microprocessors for the fastest computers and wait for them to move down the food chain, Intel will now tailor each of its new chips to a specific class of machine, the analysts were told. "It all adds up to a multisegmented strategy, which we will service with multiple products and system-level solutions," Andrew S. Grove, Intel's chairman and chief executive, told analysts at the meeting. "We are dedicated, and expect to be leaders in each of these segments." For the basic PC, Intel is considering a plan to combine everything from discrete graphics and modem chips to memory in a single chip set. However, the initial focus will be on reducing the cost of the Pentium II. The integrated functions would most likely be included in specialized core logic or executed in software, such as DVD decoding, executives said. According to the Intel road map, the Pentium with MMX technology will be eliminated by August 1998, and be replaced with a cache-less 266-MHz Pentium II that will begin to roll off the fab lines in the second quarter of 1998, rather than in the first quarter as originally scheduled. That chip will be followed in the fourth quarter of 1998 by a 300-MHz Pentium II with integrated cache. Intel has not provided pricing for either part, but analysts assume they will cost less than $200 each. And the introduction of these two chips may be even further accelerated. "I believe you can expect these two products to appear earlier [in the year] than we've [currently] indicated," Grove told analysts during a lunchtime discussion following the formal briefing last week.

To: Yousef who wrote (2184)	11/16/1997 4:36:00 AM
From: Alex Balazs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6843

Yousef, From your tone, this is very "mean spirited" and I would appreciate you being a little more tolerant of a "diversity" of views on this thread. Please try to not be so "narrow minded" ... remember, minds are like parachutes, they only work when they are open. I am completely tolerant of the "diversity" of views, but the constant mindless insistance with which Stockman tells us to "join the church of intel" does not represent the side of intel justly. There are many reasons one could argue in favor of intel, but this guy keeps cluttering up the thread with junk, and then claims you are cluttering up the thread when you post a single message telling him to stop when in actuality the one post I made to him is cluttering the thread insignificantly compared to the multitude of posts he makes daily full of his mindless drivel. As I said in my post to him, if he has information to share then he is welcome to do so, otherwise he is not welcome here at all. Alex