SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD, ARMH, INTC, NVDA -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SonnyListon who wrote (1477)5/12/2011 1:57:15 PM
From: fastpathguruRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 73107
 
If Intel wasn't ramping up it's 22nm process for an attack on phones, perhaps your assessment would be meritorious, but instead, well . . . . .

IS Intel ramping up its 22nm process for an attack on phones? Or is it going to use 22nm for the higher-performance-regime chips first?

"Atom SoCs are shipping now at 45-nanometer, moving to 32-nanometer in volume later this year, and then the Silvermont SoC's married with the new architecture will ship in 2013."

Seems Atom might not see the 22nm love as soon as you think.

fpg



To: SonnyListon who wrote (1477)5/12/2011 3:14:15 PM
From: Mahmoud MohammedRespond to of 73107
 
SonnyListon,

Re: "... perhaps your assessment would be meritorious, but instead, well . . . . ."

Just more "constipation".

Mahmoud



To: SonnyListon who wrote (1477)5/12/2011 4:42:48 PM
From: neolibRespond to of 73107
 
Before the 22nm ramp we had the 32nm ramp, and before that we had 45nm and they were preparing to assault the mobile sector back then too...