Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Matt C. Austin who wrote (26590)	11/15/1997 11:04:00 PM
From: strenlich	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Have any others received unguenous,unsigned e-mail today, or am only I blessed? Is this a regular occurrence? regards-strenlich-

To: Matt C. Austin who wrote (26590)	11/15/1997 11:12:00 PM
From: Joe Hartenbower	Respond to of 35569

Matt... >> For accurate input, I would suggest that you contact IPM. << Excellent point. If people go around taking guesses based on conventional mining backgrounds, IMO they may very well arrive at and then communicate serious errors. I think this is one of the reasons there was initially such a strong "in shock" response to the report by so many. If IPM wasn't inventing something new, someone would already be there! IMO, the proven assay only proves that it is there and provides a base index for extrapulating and evaluating recovery rates. Joe