Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James Yu who wrote (2195)	11/15/1997 11:56:00 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6843

James, <I realize he is shamless. He is 38 years with 36 years investment experience.> This doesn't work with full-time intel marketing guys. I already tried this few months ago... he just replied something like his mom paid for stock but it was he who picked it up... Do not expect him to blush with shame and stop posting. BTW, I have a qustion to ask. Intel records show that the number of outstanding shares was increased by 160,000,000 from year 96 to year 97. This is around $12-13B in cash. How these money show up in Intel books and what these money are for? Comments? Regards, Ali

To: James Yu who wrote (2195)	11/16/1997 12:45:00 AM
From: Yousef	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6843

James, Re: "I know what kind of man he is ..." You are "babbling", making no sense, just accusations ... have you no "shame". To put it in Fuchi's words, so you can understand, "Don't try to start the lady chats behind one's back. Control yourself!" Make It So, Yousef

To: James Yu who wrote (2195)	11/16/1997 6:17:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6843

I hope you answer "on you " and take that clear win and stop the kiddy posts on all fronts. I see liar this,,looser that,piss this n that, and other pre puberty toilet humor, and I wonder if these are grade school kids. You must get them to see that such posts do not impact the target at all, it impacts them in everyones eyes they are branded "child" Would they ever say that at work?, Would they keep their jobs?, no they would lose them in a heartbeat for that kind of kid stuff. Bill