Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (611725)	5/17/2011 4:51:51 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1576972

I believe in tire change, you ready need to rotate those babies

To: tejek who wrote (611725)	5/17/2011 5:15:58 PM
From: longnshort	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1576972

the one world order elitists can't handle one of their own raping a poor minority FRENCH MEDIA OUTLET GOES SNOOPING INTO IMF CHIEF ACCUSER’S NEIGHBORHOOD "The camera crew even went so far as to "interview" a neighbor through the peep hole of her door, thus showing the world the apartment number adjacent to the alleged rape victim's home. The woman on the other side of the door also told the reporters that the accuser has a 14-year-old daughter."

To: tejek who wrote (611725)	5/17/2011 9:08:57 PM
From: jlallen	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1576972

Dumbfukk: You have me on ignore.....shouldn't you be ignoring me....?

To: tejek who wrote (611725)	5/18/2011 7:37:46 AM
From: jlallen	5 Recommendations Respond to of 1576972

ted...I finally found someone who is a bigger dumbfukk than you!!! "Jan Schakowsky (D, IL): SEALs are criminals! Posted by Moe Lane (Profile) Monday, May 16th at 1:00PM EDT 36 Comments Rep. Schakowsky, attempting to explain why photos of the military operation that killed Osama bin Laden would not be released, had this to say: "These are pictures of a violent crime scene. This is a dead person. A dead Osama bin Laden," she said. Now, I will readily grant that normally a statement like this should be subject to Occam's Razor. The simplest way to explain the problems with the first sentence* would be to simply postulate that the person who uttered it is a semi-literate buffoon who is so unthinkingly programmed to parrot outworn and exploded progressive agitprop that she is truly unaware that even suggesting that Navy SEALs are criminals for killing Osama bin Laden is offensive. Or that she has not contemplated that her aforementioned parroting handily confirms every not-nice said about the average progressive antiwar politician's judgement, character, and native mother-wit. Or that (by extension) Schakowsky is accusing fellow-Democrat President Barack Obama of war crimes, given that he gave the order. Yes, really, if this had just been uttered by some nobody then you could simply chalk the comment up to pig-ignorance, coupled with thee utterer being a natural-born dmned fool. However… Jan Schakowsky is a powerful Democrat: Schakowsky serves in the House Democratic Leadership as Chief Deputy Whip and is a member of the Steering and Policy Committee. She is a member of the Energy and Commerce Committee, where she serves on the Subcommittee on Commerce, Manufacturing and Trade, the Subcommittee on Health and the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations. Democratic Leader Pelosi appointed her to serve on the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, where she is ranking Democrat on the Oversight Subcommittee. Which means that, if she's an idiot, she's not the only one; the bigger ones are the Democrats who let her onto all those committees where everybody else uses all those big words all the time. And so, if she's not an idiot… well, when are you going to introduce articles of impeachment against President Obama, Representative Schakowsky? I'm sure that we're all agog to hear that particular bit of news. Moe Lane (crosspost) To put it very simply and brutally - as Jim Geraghty did: "A crime scene? What crime would that be, and whom should be charged?" redstate.com