SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Spekulatius who wrote (42712)5/18/2011 4:30:46 PM
From: Paul Senior  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78712
 
Sorry I missed TRH for an add in $46+ area. PTP might work here, although I guess not all their Japanese earthquake/tsunami exposures have made known. I'll pass on PTP, at least for now.



To: Spekulatius who wrote (42712)5/18/2011 10:53:14 PM
From: Jurgis Bekepuris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 78712
 
Well, TRH is only slightly better than NWLI. Book value growth 10%. Of course, when looking at book value growth, one should account for the dividends paid. If that is taken into account, NWLI looks worse than TRH.

Are you again coat-tailing Einhorn? ;) Any other reasons you prefer TRH to AWH, RE, AXS? IMHO, RE has better results than TRH overall.



To: Spekulatius who wrote (42712)5/19/2011 12:06:30 AM
From: Jurgis Bekepuris  Respond to of 78712
 
PTP - choosing between these (re)insurance companies sometimes looks like splitting hairs. Except for some that are obviously lacking, the others are quite similar in long term. I guess the answer is to read through their AR sales pitch and choose the one(s) that don't seem too sleazy or incompetent. ;) But then if you look at their 10 year results, they all look fine. And if you look at current Japan/NZ/etc. exposure and losses, even BRK loses money. And if you try to predict the future, you might as well roll dice. ;)

Or buy FRFHF which outperforms on a lot of metrics, but it's trading at book+. ;)
Or buy BRK - same thing - more premium to book, bigger company, better capital allocator for now - I think I prefer FRFHF ;).