Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (611906)	5/18/2011 5:07:42 PM
From: steve harris	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578238

Everyone knows the failed socialist policies in SanFrancisco, Detroit, NewYork, etc would be successful at the national level...

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (611906)	5/18/2011 7:40:36 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 1578238

Because they already HAVE universal health care in SF, and Dallas and Houston do not?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (611906)	5/19/2011 11:25:55 AM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578238

Ted, > In actuality, Aitken explained, the high percentage of waivers is the byproduct of local law rubbing against the new national legislation. Which would still make Nancy Pelosi a flippin' hypocrite. Republicans have always been about more local government and less federal government. That includes letting San Francisco implement its own health care laws and regulations. ObamaCare seeks to impose itself upon everyone and every locality. If it doesn't fit well with San Francisco's laws, why should SF businesses get waivers and not, say, businesses in Houston or Dallas? The US is a nation; not a series of city states. Republicans are about lining the pockets of corps and not what's best for cities.