Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask Mohan about the Market -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: kormac who wrote (8073)	11/16/1997 5:53:00 AM
From: John Hunt	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18056

Here are another couple of articles to mull over: Don't Judge A Government Survey By Its Cover nypostonline.com So Much For The Buy-And-Hold Investor businessweek.com Both courtesy of Fiend's Superbear site: home.sprynet.com :-)) John

To: kormac who wrote (8073)	11/16/1997 11:41:00 AM
From: Rational	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 18056

Seppo: It seems to me that the recent (1992-1997) over-demand for capacity expansion was fueling the "growth" everywhere because capacity builders were consumers. The capacity build-up was aimed at selling products to common people who seem to have been choked by now with an over-supply of goods. That is why, I see a down-turn in most goods producers. This also means that the service sector will boom. The reason for why IBM and DEC are standing tall is because of their ever increasing strength in service which they call "enterprise solution." Intel, on the other hand, is languishing because it produces goods that can be more easily replicated than skilled service. The skilled service sector will, in general, do well, especially due to an ever-increasing demand for talent. Sankar