SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (612047)5/19/2011 1:20:20 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583389
 
Ted, > However, if he were still governor, I would not call for his impeachment. Do you see the distinction?

Never would I have called for (R)-nold's impeachment. He broke no laws. At least none that I could think of.

You're still pissed off about Clinton.

Tenchusatsu



To: tejek who wrote (612047)5/19/2011 1:26:40 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1583389
 
Did he lie to the court in a sexual harassment case ?

do you see the distinction ?



To: tejek who wrote (612047)5/20/2011 7:34:43 AM
From: jlallen4 Recommendations  Respond to of 1583389
 
Dumbfukk:

Wrong again.....their is no analogy between Clinton's wrongdoing and Arnold's.

There is nothing we know of which Arnold did which indicates any sort of violation of law or his oath of office. Clinton was not impeached for his reprehensible behavior with Lewinsky but for lying under oath.....BIG difference.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News