Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (612090)	5/19/2011 4:21:13 PM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579697

I found Broaddrick's account to be believable. I realize I could be duped by an accomplished liar, after all I was at first convinced by Clinton's finger wagging statement wrt Lewinski. Broaddrick has not been characterized by anyone who looked into this as an accomplished or even occassional liar. If she had a history of grand standing with wild stories or if there was something personally beneficial to her in coming forward like this, it might put her account into question but there was not anything like that. If it were just Broaddrick against Clinton, and I hadn't reviewed the repeated MO of Clinton's treatment of women, much of which he eventually came clean on himself, I would have greater doubt. Under the circumstance I don't have any doubts about Broaddrick's story. Has Clinton ever personally responded to it? Broaddrick filed a lawsuit against Clinton in the summer of 1999, to obtain documents which the White House may have gathered about her, claiming its refusal to accede to her demand for such documents violated the Privacy Act of 1974. The case was dismissed in 2001. The full story a good part of which you just posted, describes with great familiarity what other victims of Clinton have claimed. This pattern of Clinton behavior is now undeniably a fact, even he doesn't attempt to discount it. Look up each of the other names. There may be one false allegation in the bunch, although they all look credible to me. Many of them have already been corroborated by Clinton, after he denied them, so in the wholeness of the report, the depiction of Clinton's conduct and character rings true. Your attempt to distract from that fact by focusing only on Broaddrick, which does not change anything, also has a familiar ring which comes up lacking in the personal integrity department.