SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bob Jagow who wrote (26648)11/16/1997 5:00:00 AM
From: Tritone_ch  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 35569
 
Comment from Ron Struthers

RSA Update IPM Volume 3 # 10.9 Nov 16 1997



Int Precious Metals IPMCF on Nasdaq

I am much more positive about the recent news after an opportunity to
look at it more closely, discuss it with IPM and other contacts I have. I am
now more bullish on this stock then I ever have been because of the near term
short squeeze

THERE IS NO NEED TO PANIC !! I have repeated this once again because
after diving into this deeper I don't think it is wise to make any kind of
decision on the gold grades at BRX from what was in the news release. These
are just samples from two areas. Two areas selected at random by Bateman and
I believe that quite likely these are below average areas. The important
point I am trying to make is we cannot judge what grades are at BRX from
just two sample areas.

This news release is about verification of gold and platinum and a fire
assay, not about grades for gold reserves. Now that IPM has a verified fire
assay they can assay the 121 holes again as well as the 30 plus in the last
drill program. Once some of these results come in we will have a better idea
of grades.

Another very important point is how these samples were collected. If you
look at the assays in the table, the two highest were from the trenches. All
the auger samples are low. It is possible that a some of the gold can be
lost in auger samples on this material because of the fine material you are
drilling and the centrifugal force of the auger can cause gold lost down the
outside of the auger. The reverse circulation drilling is far better with
this material. This is what IPM used to drill all their holes and is what we
will see the assays come out on later. I discussed this matter with Dale
Runyon of Maxam. He verified this and confirmed that Maxam's gold grades
doubled when they sampled the same area by RC drilling compared to auger.
Whether this is a factor or not, I cannot be certain, but the big difference
in the trench assays vs the auger assays in the IPM press release support
this theory. Lee Furlong of IPM did not seem to think this was the case here
but had more to do with the variable grades that can be found at different
locations.

I discussed with Lee about these variances and with more recent data IPM
has collected this year, they believe the area was mineralized from two
separate areas and events. There is more gold in the SE from Volcanics and
appears there is more Platinum in the northern area of the property. Also a
there is an underground river bed through the middle of the property that
has washed out the mineralization in the bed. It is likely this area
referred to as the 1st square km and where the tests were done is not the
richest area on the property. Like any mining project, more drilling will be
needed to confirm grades and location.

Another thing to keep in mind is the fire assay never shows all the gold
that can usually be recovered in this complex ore. We won't have that
question answered to Bateman gets to bulk sampling for metallurgy testing
and feasibility study

I have visited all the desert properties and checked them out thoroughly
and know of many other individuals who have taken their own samples. These
grades in these few samples are no concern to me and I am no longer
disappointed in this regard. Like I said in the last update, a few samples
do not make a mine but only prove the existence of gold and platinum.

I believe as the drill samples come in we will see an average gold grade
by fire assay between 0.10 and 0.15 opt

Even if you take a pessimistic outlook and average the grades in the
news release of gold to 0.036 and silver to 1.48. The samples were in
the first grid and I still see no problem applying this across the 50
million tons outlined by the 121 holes in this grid. Furthermore platinum
has always proven grades as good as gold or much higher in all previous
testing. If we add in 0.036 opt platinum and just forget about palladium to
be more conservative we still have a gold equivalent (using Fridays prices
of gold silver and PT) of 5.3 million ounces of precious metals in the 1st
grid. This resource will soon be calculated and confirmed by Bateman once
the assays are completed in the 1st grid.

Is it economic? Bateman seems to think so. They have several recovery
processes to try and cost could be as low as $10/ton or less.

The confirmation by Bateman that there is gold and platinum at BRX proves
the scam callers are dead wrong. The AZDOM is dead wrong. Another nail in
the AZDOM coffin in the legal dispute. The naysayers and scam callers in the
press, on SI and the internet have been proven WRONG!!. Because of this it
is my opinion that anything they say cannot be trusted.

IPM stock is in play by the shorts and Institutions. You can expect a big
attach by the shorts and a lot B.S on the internet over the weekend. They
will try and shake confidence to drive the stock price down on Monday to
make the recent press release appear as negative. They will attach me and
anyone who speaks in favor of the company. This only proves that what I am
saying is true.

The Institutions are heavily into the stock. There support will be key
next week.

The news release on Friday has cleared the air for me to fill you in on
much more than I could prior.

There was no mention of BD. Even though my previous updates always
mentioned BD/Bateman. This is no surprise to me and shareholders should be
pleased. I have mentioned numerous times that Bateman is the best thing that
ever happened with IPM. Investors have always complained about the slow
progress of 'The BD Report'. Bateman has achieved more in three months than
BD did in three years. The acceleration in events will now be a pleasant
surprise. For whatever reason BD did not want to address the presence of
platinum at BRX. IPM needed someone to confirm this and Bateman's
experience here is the best one could find. BD was also in possession of
these COC samples so we could still see a report from them at a later date
also. Bateman will become more heavily involved and BD to a lesser extent

Auric and Friendship have been a great help but are no longer needed. The
fire assay that Auric developed worked well. The problem was they wanted a
lot of money from IPM to use it. Just look what Naxos has recently agreed
to pay for use of the Johnson/Lett technology, $5 million plus 10 million
shares.

I have nothing against Johnson/Lett, nor am I insinuating their process
does not work, but as a shareholder of IPM and if I were an Institutional
investor, I would feel way more comfortable with the reputation of Bateman
working on the project compared to a little known Auric or Johnson/Lett.

It caused considerable delay but I think IPM made the right decision by
going with Bateman for what would be considered a more customary fee. Auric
like many others are trying to get a piece of the pie and make some money
but I think what they wanted was excessive.

A gold fire assay is key, this has never been accomplished before
(confirmed by 3rd party) on BRX ore.

Bateman has confirmed Platinum at BRX, again the naysayers etc are full
of B.S.

Again I want to stress a very crucial part in this news release about
financing. Look around you, the whole mining sector is devastated, gold is
hitting 12 year lows, mines are closing, junior gold explorers are trading
for pennies. The mining giants Placer and Barrick are hitting lows they have
not seen in 6 years or more.

U.S. Institutions have agreed to fund IPM with a convertible note for a up
to $10M with a 25% premium over the stock price. Why in gods name would
institutions do this in todays market. This is the most bullish sign you
will ever discover in a junior gold explorer. It is very obvious to me that
these Institutions know a lot more than what was in todays news release.
Don't kid yourself, they have met with Bateman and know exactly where IPM is
headed.

I have learned some more detail on the financing agreement. Basically it
is a convertible bond with interest of 5.25%. The bond can be converted to
stock within a 5 year time period. The conversion price is 125% of the
stocks, market price on the day of conversion. IPM can also buy back the
bond within the first year. This is very good. It gives IPM the money at a
reasonable cost and does not dilute the stock. The possibility of dilution is
there but any conversion would be announced. This does not help the shorts
situation at all. There will be a press release on financing soon

I did confirm on the weekend that these Institutions are quite happy with
the news and have no problems. Also our big friend Guardian Capital and
another fund sees no problem. I will be talking with others on Monday.

Investing successfully is about risk and reward. A huge risk for some was
removed on Friday and that is IPM is no scam and has gold and platinum.

This is from my Short Squeeze Update on Nov 11th

On November 14th 1997, the shorts have just realized fatal error #1 & #6

"1- They have counted on BD/Bateman to prove IPM a scam. They are wrong.
This is their biggest mistake"

"6 - They may have anticipated a private placement or dilution in the
stock to help them cover lower. They are wrong. I can't divulge yet how
this will work but IPM will get financed and there won't be the shares
or dilution come to the market as they expected to help cover."

The shorts have acted on leaked and incorrect information about 6 months
old . They were counting on IPM going to Zero. They will now be in panic
mode. Expect a big attach on the SI internet thread and elsewhere

The shorts now know that they are going to have to cover and buy stock.
They will want to be covered before all the drill assay results start coming
out. I have heard there will be Institutional buying come Monday, and expect
we could see the beginning of the squeeze.

The financing with the Institutions, should close very soon, probably
next week or no later than the following week. It is quite common of them to
go in and buy a trading position to manage their risk. This could create
some hefty buying in the next two weeks.

The short position was last reported at around 800,000 but could be as
high as 1 million or more. The most shocking thing I have confirmed is a
huge short position overseas. The actual total short position is closer to 2
million shares!!!!! and the float around 4 million. These shorts did not
short a $5 stock to make a couple $ on a trade. They fully expected IPM was a
scam and it would go to zero. They now know they are in a bad position, I
think their goose may be cooked before the U.S. Thanksgiving.

This is an explosive situation and this alone puts a floor under the
stock price. Anytime the stock drops, the shorts will be buying to try and
get out of their position

I believe it would be foolish to sell on this news. There is no need to
panic the stock is pretty well into the hands of the Institutions now. I am
still bullish and would watch for a buying opportunity. The stock could be
very volatile for the next couple weeks, possibly on both the up and down
side. If I were to buy, I would try bids below market to try and pick any
dips. You can check with your broker or those on the SI thread can watch the
bid on Monday. If you see a lot of stock being bid for then we are probably
headed for a good up day. If there is not a lot of bids we could go down but
I would then expect a lot of buying from Institutional support and the
shorts trying to get out of their positions.

I can guarantee you I am not very popular with the shorts for exposing
their problem and expect I will be under lots of attach and criticism. This
will not sway me, I will continue to dig up all the information I can. The
shorts are very desperate and you can expect the attacks and the bullshit to
be flying on the Internet and perhaps in the press. They will try anything
to shake investor confidence.

There should be a few press releases from IPM coming up about the
financing and further work by Bateman. IPM has also a lot of questions from
shareholders and is compiling a Q&A that should be up on the web site on
Sunday.

I am not going to answer all the individual emails. I hope I addressed
most of your questions. Read IPMs Q&A on Sunday also. If you have further
questions I don't know if I will be able to answer your email but am always
available on my business phone through the week.

I KNOW I AM PROVIDING YOU VERY ACCURATE INFORMATION ON THE SHORT
SQUEEZE.

THE SHORTS ARE NOW FLAMING MY EMAIL BOX SENDING LARGE FILES ETC
TRYING TO CRASH MY SYSTEM. I AM THEREFORE HAVING MY ISP DELETE MY
IN MAIL ON A REGULAR BASIS SO THEREFORE I WILL LIKELY NOT GET YOUR
EMAIL MESSAGES

I would also like to answer some questions about whether I have sold
stock. The only stock I have sold was an odd lot of 80 shares a couple of
months ago. This odd lot was from the 10 to 1 consolidation a few years
back. I have traded the stock once, also, a couple months back. I sold 1000
shares and bought them back at 1/4 point cheaper, not very profitable<g>

I am not bullish on the stock because I own a pile of it. Even if it went
to zero I have made more money on DRZ, WTC and Net 1 in the last two months
then I could loose on IPM.

I still expect a short squeeze can create an extrodinary opportunity here.
Once this is out of the way the stock should be driven up by steady barrage
of drill hole releases and other exploration results and reports and sign
offs from Bateman and BD.

I hate to see you get scared out of the stock by what the shorts are
doing, They made their mistake, they should just face up and take the loss
like any of us has to do from time to time.

There just might be Gorillas all over this stock on Monday

Feel free to post this to SI and email to other shareholders. I will try
and make some posts to SI on Sunday to answer any questions I can.

The information contained herein is based on sources and data which
we believe reliable, but is not guaranteed by us. This firm and/or their
employees, officers or members of their families and investment portfolios
managed by such organizations may have a position in the securities and/or
options relating thereto and may make purchases and/or sales of these
securities or options relating thereto from time to time in the open market
or otherwise. Furthermore, this information is furnished for information
purposes and is not intended to be construed as an offer to buy or sell
securities.




To: Bob Jagow who wrote (26648)11/16/1997 10:33:00 AM
From: Albert V  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 35569
 
Bob,
Didn't mean to dump on you in particular. Claude's post was
# 26587 not #25587. Didn't want to sue you, wanted your
opinion if there grounds to sue IPMC over their HUGE discrepancy
between what the COC says and what the PRs said.
I have such a sick feeling in my gut.
Albert