Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Snowshoe who wrote (74362)	5/20/2011 9:57:36 PM
From: Cogito Ergo Sum	1 Recommendation Respond to of 217755

agree... The reaction from the entrenched... is well... laughable... if it was some poor schmo... they couldn't give a fcuk... and would be SURE that he/she deserved it... That's the system.. love it or leave it... How long before TJ calls a halt to DSK talk ;0)

To: Snowshoe who wrote (74362)	5/21/2011 8:47:37 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	1 Recommendation Respond to of 217755

Snowshoe I rally against WS scum because I know way too much about their game and how they get "scotch free" when they are found stealing beyond the normal norms with their hands in the cookie jars. (see TJ recent post siliconinvestor.com Contributions to electoral campaign or elected officials pet projects makes wonders in how to administer justice or better said not to administer justice for crimes committed. The game goes like this – steal or swindle $100K from the public/electorate, pay the taxes and pay $10K to $15K to those running for office to their various election funds and pet projects tax free.