SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Alighieri who wrote (612276)5/21/2011 11:11:46 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 1579774
 
Nonsense. Its not tax cuts....it spending. If you cut taxes and revenues do not increase you need to cut spending. Entitlements need to be reformed. Hopefully the next Congress has the balls to do something before the country goes over the cliff....



To: Alighieri who wrote (612276)5/21/2011 11:59:40 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579774
 

Just two policies dating from the Bush Administration — tax cuts and the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan — accounted for over $500 billion of the deficit


Afg is Obamas War. The Good War. Yet, you want to blame Bush for Obama's deficits during it?

As to the tax cuts, we simply don't know HOW BAD the economy might have been without them. WHICH IS PRECISELY THE REASON THE DEMOCRATS AND OBAMA CONTINUED THEM.

Blaming Bush for horrible economic policy has come and gone. We are now in the midst of the worst economic crisis in our nation's history. And it is on Obama's watch, NOT Bush's.

Whatever Bush may have gotten wrong in the economy is NOTHING compared with the blunders Obama made that have exacerbated it.

We have moved from a short term economic crunch to a full scale economic collapse, UNDER THE WEIGHT OF OBAMA INSANE SPENDING. His partisanship and that of other Democrats makes it impossible to solve these problems.

It has now been PROVEN AGAIN that liberal economic policy just doesn't work, just as it was during the depression when FDR dragged it out almost a full decade longer than it otherwise would have been. Now Obama has done the same.



To: Alighieri who wrote (612276)5/21/2011 2:16:33 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579774
 
Well this is progress......Rush finally admits that the right has become radical.

Morning Score: Gingrich still getting pounded

By POLITICO STAFF | 5/17/11 5:56 AM EDT

From today's edition:

THE RIGHT SLAMS NEWT – ON THE AIRWAVES – The conservative opinion elite is just all-out unloading on former House Speaker Newt Gingrich for criticizing Paul Ryan’s budget plan, with thought leaders from Rush Limbaugh to Rich Lowry joining in the pile-on. Limbaugh used his show to accuse Gingrich of cynically seeking out a “niche to occupy” in the 2012 field.” RUSH: “It's amazing how many people seek out niches … So the niche here is, ‘Everybody but me is radical. Republicans are radical here with their social engineering. Democrats are radical. We need somebody more reasonable, like me.’ That's the niche that Newt's trying to find here … I know what he's trying to do with that, but this is the politics of it right now. There's a groundswell here for a massive, massive reduction in the size of government.” bit.ly

AND – IN PRINT: National Review editor Rich Lowry dedicates his column today to ridiculing Gingrich, arguing that the Georgian turns every debate into “a grand sociological clash between different regions of the country.” RICH: “He can’t help himself. Gingrich prefers extravagant lambasting when a mere distancing would do, and the over-arching theoretical construct to a mundane pander. He is drawn irresistibly to operatic overstatement — sometimes brilliant, always interesting and occasionally downright absurd … It’s Newt’s misfortune to want a high-pressure executive job with monarchical trappings where steadfastness and dignity matter.” bit.ly

Read more: politico.com



To: Alighieri who wrote (612276)5/21/2011 10:25:02 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Respond to of 1579774
 
Great find...



To: Alighieri who wrote (612276)5/22/2011 1:13:26 PM
From: Brumar89  Respond to of 1579774
 
If the tax cuts were so bad why did the Democrats extend them? And it the wars are so bad, why are the Democrats contintuing Bush's wars, escalating one and starting a brand new one?

And if they were going to extend tax rates, why did they let Americans think their taxes were going to be raised for so many years?

And why did they try to impose carbon taxes on our country?