Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (612451)	5/22/2011 1:29:33 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 1571051

Boo to Whew!: GOP Reacts to Daniels' Dodge GINGRICH, PREDICTABLY, IS QUITE RELIEVED; EYES TURN TO PAUL RYAN, OTHERS By Polly Davis Doig, Newser Staff Posted May 22, 2011 10:33 AM CDT (NEWSER) – A reeling GOP took to the airwaves today to react to Mitch Daniels' decision not to run for president, reports Politico, and to speculate on who might take his place. Paul Ryan's reaction was typically "disappointed. I think his candidacy would have been a great addition to this race." Would-have-been rival Newt Gingrich, meanwhile, had trouble not looking relieved at Daniels' departure, saying he would have been "a formidable competitor." Elsewhere around the Sunday dial: Maybe Ryan was disappointed on a personal level, because Dick Armey turned the crosshairs squarely on him: "Frankly, we are disappointed. I was just saying this morning, maybe it's time to start drafting Paul Ryan." Ryan fired back at Gingrich's infamous diss of his budget as "right wing social engineering," calling it "deeply inaccurate, a gross mischaracterization." Gingrich addressed his huge tab at Tiffany's—sort of. "It's my private life," he said, calling himself just "a guy running for president who pays all his bills." Herman Cain is not broke, despite $13 in the bank: "The PAC account ended in December that's why it shows $13. Friends of Herman Cain is doing just fine, but we need more," he said.

To: i-node who wrote (612451)	5/22/2011 4:44:41 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Respond to of 1571051

No, he's just a Lib.