SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Tankwatch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: zax who wrote (4759)5/23/2011 4:56:35 PM
From: iggyl  Respond to of 32692
 
Apple should step up and indemnify their developers, just as EFF asked. It was their mistake to require developers to use an API without licensing the technology for those developers.

You mean like Google and WebM or Google and HTC?

We'll see how this plays out. At least Apple has stepped into the legal fray. One thing we know for sure is Google has dodged all responsibility.



To: zax who wrote (4759)5/23/2011 5:53:00 PM
From: iggyl  Respond to of 32692
 
Try this one zax

Through its threatened infringement claims against users of Apple's licensed technology, Lodsys is invoking patent law to control the post-sale use of these licensed products and methods. Because Lodsys's threats are based on the purchase or use of Apple products and services licensed under the Agreement, and because those Apple products and services, under the reading articulated in your letters, entirely or substantially embody each of Lodsys's patents, Lodsys's threatened claims are barred by the doctrines of patent exhaustion and first sale. As the Supreme Court has made clear, "[t]he authorized sale of an article that substantially embodies a patent exhausts the patent holder's rights and prevents the patent holder from invoking patent law to control postsale use of the article." Quanta Computer, Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc., 553 U.S. 617 (2008).

engadget.com

So what about Google? Who's back have they got zax?