Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (277908)	5/23/2011 8:29:05 PM
From: Sdgla	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Zbigniew Brzezinski, Obama's top foreign policy adviser, United States National Security Adviser to President Jimmy Carter, and notorious Jew hater pulls back the curtain.......... Speechless. Protecting Iranian airspace. I shudder to think what the next three years holds. Terrible, all of it. Who, in America, would stand with Obama? Bloody frightening. Brezinski Calls for Obama to Shoot Down Israeli Jets; "A Liberty in Reverse" Weekly Standard (hat tip Marvin) In a little noticed interview with the Daily Beast (presumably little noticed because serious people don't read the Daily Beast), Zbigniew Brzezinski suggests that Barack Obama do more than just refuse to support an Israeli strike on Iran's nuclear sites -- the American president must give the order to shoot down Israeli aircraft as they cross Iraqi airspace: DB: How aggressive can Obama be in insisting to the Israelis that a military strike might be in America’s worst interest? Brzezinski: We are not exactly impotent little babies. They have to fly over our airspace in Iraq. Are we just going to sit there and watch? DB: What if they fly over anyway? Brzezinski: Well, we have to be serious about denying them that right. That means a denial where you aren’t just saying it. If they fly over, you go up and confront them. They have the choice of turning back or not. No one wishes for this but it could be a Liberty in reverse. Contrary to Brezinski's half-hearted disclaimer that no one wishes for such an outcome, there are plenty on the left who would delight in a pitched battle between the United States and Israel. Democrats in Congress routinely support resolutions affirming Israel's right to take whatever steps it deems necessary to assure its own national defense. And Obama has at least paid lip service to the concept. But hostility to Israel among the rank and file is very real on the left -- and among "realists." So conjure the image -- the Obama administration sending U.S. aircraft up to protect Iran's airspace and it's nuclear installations from an attack by a democracy that is one of America's closest allies. Unfortunately, this may not be so hard to imagine in Israel, where the number of people who believe Obama is pro-Israel is at just 4 percent -- and falling. And given Obama's (literally) submissive posture to the Saudis, his indulgence of the Iranians, and his simultaneously hard-line approach to Israel, it seems even some of Obama's supporters can savor the possibility of a "reverse Liberty." atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com

To: steve harris who wrote (277908)	5/24/2011 1:05:24 AM
From: SARMAN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

So I am right. You are right on what? You did not define Israel's enemies, nor proved that Obama is a Muslim. Fine, search and read all about the Obama's foreign policy adviser saying they would shoot down Israeli aircraft if they defended themselves against Iran. Only the people that love Israel would say that. Imagine, Israel bombing Iran, Iran will flatten Tel Aviv. American can control the Saudis, the Egyptians, the Syrians but has no control over Iran. Iran has the tools and the means to bomb every square inch of Israel. Why do you think the Israelis are crying wolf? Also, Israel has a tendency of defending itself against an imaginary enemy by attacking first. We all know what defending means in Hebrew. LOL