SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (612630)5/23/2011 10:17:17 PM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578198
 
From Oblivious:

OLD POLICY:
We capture you. Fly you to Guantanamo Bay Detention Center. You get new clothes, three meals a day and your Quran.

NEW POLICY:
We come to your house in the middle of the night, kill you and dump your body into the ocean.

Compliments of Seal Team 6

Change is Good!



To: i-node who wrote (612630)5/23/2011 10:44:01 PM
From: tejek  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578198
 
> Did you ever consider why their assets went up 20% in one year?

Maybe they cut spending. The US could learn something, even from this nutjob.


Actually, you are probably right. They did some incredible stock investing......bought at the bottom and sold at the top. Thanks for clearing it up.



To: i-node who wrote (612630)5/23/2011 11:20:52 PM
From: bentway  Respond to of 1578198
 
New Polling Says Overwhelming Majority Wants Social Security Left Alone

Evan McMorris-Santoro | May 23, 2011, 8:44AM
tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com

Ask the voters and they'll tell you: Social Security cuts are off the table when it comes to cleaning up the budget mess in Washington.

Fresh polling from Ohio, Missouri, Montana and Minnesota published first by TPM show voters in the states overwhelmingly oppose any cuts to the Social Security entitlement program, even in the name of reducing the national debt. The coalition of progressive groups which sponsored the survey say the polls send a clear message to the Democratic Senate incumbents up for reelection in each state: cut Social Security and you'll incur the wrath of an angry electorate.

Public Policy Polling (D) conducted the polls, which were sponsored by the Progressive Change Campaign Committee, Democracy For America, MoveOn.org and CREDO Action. All four groups are strongly opposed to making cuts to Social Security, which some -- including President Obama's debt commission -- have said are necessary to put the government's fiscal house in order for the future.

The PPP numbers, gathered between late April and last week, suggest the electorate is on the side of the progressives. The polls were conducted in the home states of Democratic Sens. Sherrod Brown (OH), Claire McCaskill (MO), John Tester (MT), and Amy Klobuchar (MN), all of whom are up for reelection in 2012.

The results (each poll surveyed more than a thousand people has a margin of error of about 3%):

In order to reduce the national debt, would you support or oppose cutting spending on Social Security, which is the retirement program for the elderly?
Ohio: 16% support, 80% oppose
Missouri: 17% support, 76% oppose
Montana: 20% support, 76% oppose
Minnesota: 23% support, 72% oppose

National polls have shown a similar reticence to cut Social Security in the name of cleaning up the budget. New national numbers from the AP show "most Americans say they don't believe Medicare has to be cut to balance the federal budget, and ditto for Social Security."

PCCC co-founder Stephanie Taylor said her poll numbers show voters will not tolerate any cuts to Social Security -- and Democratic incumbents would be wise to take them off the table before election season heats up.

"This polling shows that Democratic incumbents facing re-election in 2012 will have serious problems if they vote to cut Social Security," Taylor said. "President Obama and all congressional Democrats should follow Harry Reid in saying that Social Security is off the table -- and then fight hard for popular tax increases on oil companies, Wall Street, and the rich."