SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : America On-Line: will it survive ...? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: David L. who wrote (5982)11/16/1997 12:21:00 PM
From: Eric Klein  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13594
 
What makes you think that AOL can not have a 6000 P/E. If people have money and want to buy the stock they will buy it. That makes the stock price go up regardless of the P/E. If there is some kind of good news on Monday the stock will go up big.

I'm going right out on Monday morning and buy some of these tulips! OOPS... I meant to say AOL stock.



To: David L. who wrote (5982)11/16/1997 11:48:00 PM
From: purecntry5  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13594
 
"What makes you think that AOL can not have a 6000 P/E. If people have
money and want to buy the stock they will buy it. That makes the stock
price go up regardless of the P/E..."

I thought I had too much to drink the first time I read that... Its very sad to see what the last few years of market performance has created actually.

Cowboy Brett



To: David L. who wrote (5982)11/17/1997 12:45:00 AM
From: Brent D. Beal  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13594
 
***What makes you think that AOL can not have a 6000 P/E. If people have money
and want to buy the stock they will buy it. That makes the stock price go up
regardless of the P/E. If there is some kind of good news on Monday the stock will
go up big***

Please slap yourself upside the head and then go look at the charts of CSCC, ASND, IOM, AMAT, etc.--all stocks that couldn't go down because they "didn't trade on fundamentals". It's not a question of if, but of when. . .