Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (612913)	5/25/2011 1:47:55 PM
From: HPilot	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579842

nail Clinton and you see what you got..... Disbarment. Not enough, but something.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (612913)	5/25/2011 2:10:31 PM
From: Jim McMannis	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579842

Clinton just could have resigned and saved us the money.

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (612913)	5/25/2011 2:25:06 PM
From: one_less	1 Recommendation Respond to of 1579842

Ahh … some facts, combined with some bull. And either too much booze or a deliberate attempt to mischaracterize content. Fact, Clinton got nailed for his lying abuses but I would have had him simply step down and allow Gore to take the reigns when his abuses of power were first being exposed. So your allegation that I conspired or enjoyed any of that fiasco then or now is bull. I had been a clinton supporter up to the time his flawed character began to be exposed. I agree that the money spent was a waste of 30billion, and even more importantly that society was damaged in the process, mostly by the ridiculous extent each extreme went to in either protecing or nailing clinton. Try re-reading this post you responded to. Message 27386625 I made 2 points: The first point was simply to offer some perspective for tejek who stated, “I can't stop laughing!” wrt Arnold S. getting caught in infidelity. The second point is a correction to his reduction of sameness wrt the conduct of the two men. They have very different backgrounds. They have very different private and public lives. But share some things, no active father in their lives, they are famous public figure, and as adults both are philanderers. Clinton, however, has a long list of serious abuse of power complaints and personal abuse complaints lodged by women he has had personal relations with, and now by society who has found him guilty of public abuses. Point 1) Children without an active father is no joke: With “ 250 million starving orphans in the world today, a huge percentage of children in the USA are not being raised by their fathers, many with no male support at all...and the statistical results depict and predict devastation for them.” Point 2) There is little comparison between clinton and Arnold S. except maybe for their hung stud opinions of themselves. I pointed that out by posting the long list of women who had corroborated reports of their abuses under Clinton. Which, btw, did not cost 30 Billion dollars, these women and their stories are believable and were largely separate except that they received additional credibility when his shit hit the fan. Most had complained long before his famous fraudulent behavior while engaging the justice system. You decided to pick on Juanita Broaddrick who was but one name on a long list and you tried attacking her but that was dumb and you failed to accomplish your goal of proving anything about clinton, besides that it had nothing to do with the jist of my post.