Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Beat The Street With SI Traders -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (81714)	5/25/2011 10:03:24 PM
From: LoneClone	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 233845

Do take another look at CUU. I did the same thing, putting it in the reject bin after I sold out, but now I wish I hadn't. In the last few years they have acquired adjoining properties that look like they could easily double the size of the deposit based on the geophysics if their modelling is correct. Add in the power line coming in and I am not even afraid of the Teck backin provisions. 25% of this potential mine would still be a helluva lot of minerals. And I can't help but think that if Teck is going to get 75%, why not pay some more and buy the whole company. I would imagine that is what Echeverria, who owns 52% of the company, is hoping for. LC