Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Plastics to Oil - Pyrolysis and Secret Catalysts and Alterna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: streetscraper who wrote (7612)	5/26/2011 12:23:21 PM
From: scion	Respond to of 53574

The description 'bent-nose goon' - (as nantowin so aptly calls him) - fits well.

To: streetscraper who wrote (7612)	5/26/2011 12:45:33 PM
From: scion	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 53574

...Mr. Wesson also moved shares into his direct control. The speculation as to the purpose is not conspiratorial in nature. It does however, go against the grain of insider ownership proving confidence in JBI. jimmenknee Share Thursday, May 26, 2011 12:36:47 PM Re: BRIG_88 post# 110025 Post # of 110036 Hard to post anything real that could be construed as controversial without receiving a chuckle and a label... the point is the post's average slant is favorable to neutral, whereas the data points to unfavorable to neutral. And yes by moving shares to beneficiaries who do not have to report holdings, there will be no further understanding of the disposition; however, Mr. Wesson also moved shares into his direct control. The speculation as to the purpose is not conspiratorial in nature. It does however, go against the grain of insider ownership proving confidence in JBI. I see it as someone who has suggested a need to supplement income-- nothing wrong with that siliconinvestor.com