Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (613365)	5/27/2011 1:55:41 PM
From: TimF	3 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579913

You seem to like making arguments from authority (a week type of argument to begin with), when the authority in question doesn't back up your point. (This conversation is one recent/current example, the "default on spending" claim, another, and you've done it in the past as well.) Not being convicted of perjury doesn't imply that you didn't commit perjury, or even that the court decided that you didn't commit it, it just failed to decide you did. He was found in contempt of court of his lies under oath, even though he was never convicted of perjury. He was also fined for giving false testimony, and he was disbarred. None of which was in response to him having sex, it was his statements under oath that resulted in the penalties against him.