SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Albert V who wrote (26703)11/16/1997 3:35:00 PM
From: Ron Struthers  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 35569
 
<<I bought it because they said they had a Fire Assay in
FEB97 that worked and pulled .25 ounces ton gold out.
A lot of people didn't beleive them and guess what-THEY
STILL DON'T.>>

Albert do you think it would have been wise to pay $$millions to use this assay?

Again I stress you cannot expect every assay to come back the same whether it is .25 or 0.04. Different drill holes and samples will get different results. It is the average with appropriate cutoffs across many samples that count.

I expect we will see assays above 0.25 as well

Ron



To: Albert V who wrote (26703)11/16/1997 4:02:00 PM
From: Joe Hartenbower  Respond to of 35569
 
Albert... did you cover yourself by going short? If you made your your total buy decision based on one non COC assay/recovery that was NOT represented as the basis for evaluating anything more than one sample, you made a good decision. Wow, that's like betting even amounts on red and black in Las Vegas.

If I am wrong, I appologize. However, you realy seem to be attacking IPM and I and many others question your basis for that action.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News