SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Beat The Street With SI Traders -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: marcos who wrote (81919)5/28/2011 5:25:18 AM
From: TheSlowLane  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 233843
 
Uh...when was it fourteen bucks? Wrong chart?



To: marcos who wrote (81919)5/29/2011 12:02:09 PM
From: Terry Maloney1 Recommendation  Respond to of 233843
 
>>ort.a - likely a severe retrace coming, back to eight or nine bucks after nearing fourteen<<

From your lips to God's ears ... <g>

As for the possibility of a takeout, I figure it's a near certainty if the process works. Rio Tinto, among others, will be watching closely.

Then we let them worry about the transportation issues. <g>



To: marcos who wrote (81919)5/30/2011 9:33:18 AM
From: ogi  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 233843
 
Marcos, I like a man who can see the future so clearly!!

I am afraid my french is so rudimentary I cannot get much of what Andre is saying. However I can't see shipping via the river as any serious impediment, including ice. EG here in N.S. we have gypsum mines and rock quarries that ship direct to ocean from their own specialized stand alone piers. Other than draft depth loading and unloading facilities I cannot see as a barrier.

Hope that is not too far off.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News