SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (613711)5/29/2011 7:40:28 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1587726
 
"He came into office very nearly a socialist. "

Only in the fevered imaginings of the extreme Right. It had no basis in reality. I will grant you that he wasn't a complete servile lapdog for business, but that is a totally different thing.

It isn't something that is strictly binary.

"The first year of his presidency proves this, with the enactment of Obamacare and the waste of a trillion dollars on a failed liberal economic program. "

Neither of those were socialist. For one, the ACA is about as pro-business as you can get. Much of it was a gift to the insurance companies. A socialist bill would have been totally different. And the stimulus was likewise very pro-business. A large percentage consisted of tax cuts, which were ineffective in that environment. The rest was payments that resulted in money going into the pockets of businesses.

"Anti-business? Of course. The BP witch hunt"

Now that is hilarious. It was far from a witch hunt. By BP's own records, they violated industry best practices, remember the things you said everyone followed in a given industry?, and it blew up in their face. What was supposed to happen, everyone just say "oopsie" and nothing happens? I will grant you that Smirk would have handled it that way, but...

It isn't anti-business to insist that a company take responsibility for their actions. It is anti-American to not do so.



To: i-node who wrote (613711)5/30/2011 1:18:57 PM
From: TimF2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1587726
 
He's pro business special interests (not in general for all businesses, but for a larger subset, for example pro-union business and pro anything claiming to be "green"), not pro-free market, not even in the mild sense that would actually be possible for an American president in the real world.