Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: combjelly who wrote (613790)	5/30/2011 1:27:48 PM
From: TimF	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580037

The judge in the case didn't declare there was no perjury. Clinton wasn't convicted of perjury, lack of conviction is not an affirmative declaration of innocence. But if it makes you happy substitute "lying under oath", for perjury. Thus Clinton was impeached, disbarred, and fined, for lying under oath. The point is that those things happened because of lying under oath, not because of his sex life. Tim, in almost every one of your posts, you throw out fringe stuff with no more support than your word, and basically pretend that it is common knowledge. Despite the fact that it isn't. Both false, and irrelevant. (Irrelevant because doing that is not making an argument from authority. It could be considered a making a gratuitous or unsupported assertion, that's a statement without supporting argument, not an argument from authority).

To: combjelly who wrote (613790)	5/30/2011 1:31:43 PM
From: Brumar89	2 Recommendations Respond to of 1580037

Stepping up to defend Bill Clinton's honor tells us a lot about you. When are you going to come to Weiner's defense? That poor pure-minded innocent fellow is being victimized by evil conservative hackers.