SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tom Trader who wrote (14478)11/16/1997 2:55:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9  Respond to of 50167
 
THE OFFER IS IN THE FOLLOWING POST

A TRADE

ON THE 12th
an S&P option

Ike don't try to back out of it now...of course, if you want to be spineless and confuse everyone that is okay....I would expect it.

TT you take these posts to your lawyer and have them go over it with a fine tooth comb.

+Tom Trader (14446 )
From: +IQBAL LATIF
Sunday, Nov 16 1997 2:03PM EST
Reply #14452 of 14478

TT my brother Paris is gloomy so is your post now-now lets have your trade and you
win 100,000$. 12th Nov S&P futures short. Don't side track the question is simple my
brother this all will be wiped out and NK proven guilty if you can show that your a/c
had a trade on 12th evening with an S&P option. You have been taking this thread as
your backyard property but I will only allow you to go further if you let me know the
name of your trader. I am ready to work out the modalities now. Look at your letters
of last night you were walking like a elephant on this trough. Now the question is
simple as host I want your trade on 12th to be documented. You knew nothing about
the price. I will pay 100,000$ in prize money. 15000$ from NK you are a rich man.
Last time I was chalenged by one of your thread colleague I posted my traders name
and address, I need the same to see if you are a genuine trader.



To: Tom Trader who wrote (14478)11/16/1997 2:56:00 PM
From: IQBAL LATIF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50167
 
TT- my response is clear- the trade 500$/contract/on S&P future was not there. you were paper trading an instrument which ceased to exist on 2nd Nov. This was NK point and that is exactly how I jhave defined it.



To: Tom Trader who wrote (14478)11/16/1997 3:12:00 PM
From: ViperChick Secret Agent 006.9  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 50167
 
TT

I am leaving it to you to deal with.

You are quite capable of handling yourself ;-)))))

Ike is trying to back out now. The true and clear issue is what their accusations are...and I have stated them. Read through the posts.

This is a moral issue to me. Display Ike and NK's morality to the fullest extent possible.

Notice how Ike trys to back out after you accept the offer..as if he made it to shame you knowing that you wouldn't accept because you never made a trade and would have to skulk away in shame!!!

Back to lurking on this train wreck.



To: Tom Trader who wrote (14478)11/16/1997 9:35:00 PM
From: Tom Trader  Respond to of 50167
 
Thread--I need to get a couple off things of my chest and then I shall try and refrain from posting on all of this

So please, bear with me--while I do that in a couple of posts