SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Rocky Mountain Int'l (OTC:RMIL former OTC:OVIS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: KMT who wrote (18726)11/16/1997 4:13:00 PM
From: Typhoon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
KMT, if he turns up information which is true, and can be verified, then I welcome that information, regardless of whether or not it reflects positively or negatively on the company.

So, yes, I'm concerned about any numbers which might impact my investment.

No, I will not flat-out reject Mike's information, but I will not blindly believe what he says unless he can prove something to me. However, I will flat-out reject insulting behavior and attacks because it doesn't belong here.

Kevin, if you feel he's saved you money, that's great. I just don't get as strong a sense of benevolance from him. I don't think he's here to save me money, or looking out for my interests. I base that not on what he says, but how he says it.

Just look at his last post.



To: KMT who wrote (18726)11/16/1997 4:25:00 PM
From: TopCat  Respond to of 55532
 
KMT,

I agree, with a couple of exceptions, reaction has gone pretty much as predicted......below:

----------------------------

To: KMT (17712 )
From: TopCat Thursday, Nov 13 1997 10:50PM EST
Reply #17714 of 18732

KMT, Repost.

-----------------

To: John Gault (16985 )
From: TopCat Wednesday, Nov 12 1997 12:39AM EST
Reply #16996 of 17712

John,

It's simple. Mike is willing to debate the issue with Riley only if Riley will commit to the debate. If Mike just posts his information without Riley's commitment...the post will be ignored (at best) or flamed (as is typical). If Riley commits to the debate then chooses not to debate after the information is provided, he will lose face. Both of these people are smart......and my bet is that Riley will not rise to the bait....for his own reasons, for which I can only speculate.

TC



To: KMT who wrote (18726)11/16/1997 6:03:00 PM
From: Ellen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 55532
 
most RMIL'ers seem to have flat out rejected the information Mike has shown simply because he's Mike.

Speaking only for myself, it isn't rejected just because it comes from him, period. It is rejected because it comes from his bias.

I've seen Mike on other threads, well before OVIS/RMIL became a play. I highly doubt that his intentions are anything other then he's indicated. His DD and experience is top notch IMO. I didn't like what he had to say on SYCR when I was long there, but he did save me a lot of money.

I'm sure he will flame me for this, but regardless of how he behaved on other threads and regardless of how good you consider his DD, He has NOT behaved objectively here and his DD has been proven, many times by many people, to be questionable on this particular stock.