Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Donald Watson, Jr. who wrote (26758)	11/16/1997 9:23:00 PM
From: Ron Struthers	Respond to of 35569

<<Can we assume that Batemen could come up with a fire assay to match there numbers>> Don, The short answer is they have. All Auric had was a Fire Assay, but this was very important. Bateman came up with the same thing in about 3 months, IMO very impressive. We cannot compare the Auric and Bateman FA because we didn't compare the same sample. Only IPM and Bateman know how it compares. From what I could find out the Bateman assay works well. Even more important, I think they have the smarts for a platinum FA also. Ron