Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (26799)	11/16/1997 5:34:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 35569

I've got the WTC report I've got the WTC report nyah nyah nyah yah.

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (26799)	11/16/1997 5:40:00 PM
From: Matt C. Austin	Respond to of 35569

The following comments are extracted from Chatters posts over the last two weeks: ----- It has taken them 7 months to collate two pages that say 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 all down one column under Pt group metals. Tough job ----- Lumbert and Coggins are right. I know that. But it is not from their information that I KNOW that. ----- You know I did zero testing or due diligence about Delgratia. But I had information. Very good information. And I was right. Another one bite the dust. ----- Maybe its a lie. Maybe they got assays and all back in March and talked the company into rechecking as the results did not please them.. ----- The Behre Dohlbear report that you people are so anxiously awaiting WAS FINISHED IN MARCH OF THIS YEAR. Now, are you not a tad anxious as to why it has not been released? ---- Fact Dohlbear report is finished. There is no ongoing work or verification. Its a lie. ----- No Mark, I am not fooling you. There is GENUINE trouble with F lake and B rock. Bad trouble. BD finished in March. There is no verification. That is a lie. ----- Yep it has been completed. they did not say WHEN. IT WAS MARCH!!!!!! -------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- It's very apparent to me that someone inside Behre Dolbear was furnishing Coggins, et al with inside information. IMO he gave the data to Lumbert, Chatters, Schechter etc. The real surprise is that none of these dummies understood that the report they got ahold of in March was only one of many daily reports and plenty more were to come. The idiots used one ZERO assay to try and wreck the company. Plenty more that this gang of thieves were up to. I hope a Federal Grand Jury can get to the bottom of it.

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (26799)	11/16/1997 5:43:00 PM
From: Lew Green	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

You could be right Larry, but it just was an amazing call to me-- I don't think he would have the report but he might have had knowledge if what it would or would not contain and there are many possible sources shorts could intercept this -- other than IPM. Let's face it if they can develop strong relationships at Bloomberg, they can do so elsewhere. But, true it could just have been lucky or brilliant. What gives me pause is the way he conceeded, "no scam", man, these guys usually don't do that. The other thing that adds weight for me is I am convinced he is Schechter. I'm told that people leave a trail wherever they surf the net... Also, his having a phone in Hilton Head was a false... atleast as Michael Grasso. Finally, I know someone who knows Schechter who feels they recognise some tone and syntax. It paints a picture -- but yes, you are right, all just speculation and hypothesis. Lew PS... I did notice that Grasso misspelled Schechter in a recent denial -- I love the nuances. Anything's possible, but Hungry Lion is certainly Mr. Schechter and he denies it too. One of them are on the thread constantly now it seems, monitoring every post and responding very quickly. They seem to be "working" IMO.

To: Larry Brubaker who wrote (26799)	11/16/1997 5:58:00 PM
From: Bill Jackson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Larry; If I had such a report, and I was crooked I would organize some shorts. Did that happen on Friday or earlier that week? In the release cycle there is some leakage unless you compose it yourself, type it yourself, and send it to the dispersion means yourself. In addition, if an exchange has to approve it, I guarantee that people have the chance to peek and use the delays. Often when I do a press release I do it after closing, all phases and let no one but me and other officers see it. My Co is tiny, but I am sure Barrick is similarly cautious. When did this hit the wire? After close?, was it sent to a PR co before that close? If so leaks can happen as shorts bribe on many parallel fronts. Bill