Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The 56 Point TA; Charts With an Attitude -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John_W who wrote (7739)	11/16/1997 6:51:00 PM
From: freelyhovering	Respond to of 79469

Blaming it on me again, are you John? We'll I'm passing the blame to Instock, who I was teasing about his cliche'. But I think I hurt his fellings. He hasn't talked to me since. <gg> Myron

To: John_W who wrote (7739)	11/16/1997 11:12:00 PM
From: scott ma	Respond to of 79469

John: I know you was questioning oversold of RLLY. Just because your post is the last one I read at that time, I simply pressed the Respond key. Please note that I didn't put your name on my post. I purcahsed RADAF at $7, $11, and $12, before this market correction. I didn't know 56's until a POW of 56's is RADAF. Then several persons on this thread made huge noise on the RADAF board. I just want to understand how Doug's technique can find such a good stock, RADAF. Unfortunately, I still have no clue. That is why I still follow this thread. As RLLY, one more point I would like to contribute to this board is the rank of accumulatin to distribution of RLLY is still A (the best), see Monday IBD. That means institution share holders don't want dump this stock at this moment even the stock plunge about 30% from its recent high. This is a very good indicator. People don't want to sell a stock. How come it indicated oversold? :=) Hope this helps.