Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : The coming US dollar crisis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Real Man who wrote (38899)	6/5/2011 11:36:00 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 71475

Gold does not have a place in modern central banking, except that some CBs keep it in reserves; some don't. I used to think so, too. Except its rise has eerily correlated negatively with the increase in paper stock. I think we need to have something rare, fungible, relatively portable, and beautiful as a marker. Otherwise, whatever we use can be created out of thin air and therefore devalued. Gold just is, it does not need trust or confidence to hold its value. It inspires confidence in a fiat currency to the extent a CB has it. We - the Treasury - have lots and lots of gold, but there are also lots and lots of USD.

To: Real Man who wrote (38899)	6/6/2011 10:34:26 AM
From: Tommaso	19 Recommendations Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 71475

When you think about it, we have only been on a fiat dollar standard for 40 years. During that 40 years, the United States consolidated its position as the most powerful country on earth. For the last 20 years the United States has been allowed to borrow without limit from other countries. 20 years and 40 years seem like a long time to a human being who can only expect to live at most about 80 years, and often much less. So to a lot of people, the paper dollar seems like a permanent feature of the financial landscape. But if you look only a hundred years back--only 60 years earlier than 1971--you see numerous examples of important currencies that have lost much of their value or even disappeared. If you look back only 150 years, you see an entire section of the United States (the Confederacy) where the currency became totally worthless. If you extend the horizon back 300 years, to 1711, you see the greatest European power at that date (France) introducing a paper currency twice in the same century, and both times it became worthless. If you go back a thousand years and study the currency history of China, you see more examples of paper money supply being expanded until it became worthless. But because most of us run around in our lives like ants under a picnic table, unable to see very far in any direction and focussed on our immediate needs and plans, the 40 years since 1971 seems like an eternity. Furthermore, in the midst of that eternity, a very great man, Paul Volcker, did what was necessary to rescue the fiat money system so that it could continue to operate another 30 years. I see absolutely no possibility that there is any intelligence, courage, or political will that can rescue the fiat dollar a second time.