Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Environmentalist Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (33483)	6/6/2011 2:40:43 PM
From: Land Shark	Respond to of 36917

>since there is no such thing as AGW his post was spot on But you're a sociopathic pathalogical AGW denier, I wouldn't expect anything but any spec of "evidence" from some unrelated paradox to further firm up your belief system re. AGW. That paradox is about their failure to replicate fully an operating point 3-5 Billion years ago. Perhaps they missed something. IMO, it's a combination of albedo and GHG that lead to the liquid earth conditions. They need to go over their inputs into the model again. Clouds are not the only story.