SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bearcatbob who wrote (152294)6/7/2011 1:25:52 PM
From: raybiese  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206160
 
I see little evidence that such a pipeline would be approved within Canada. The ideological warriors are both our friend and enemy on this issue.

Bob: Count on it. Not if, but when. Chinese ownership of flowing oil sands barrels just not at critical mass yet. It takes time but Canucks have long memories after being screwed over.
e.g. AECO-Nymex= Kitimat LNG & note time line of approvals: rigzone.com
Northern Gateway just starting to slog through the process.
en.wikipedia.org
The old (1950's) Trans Mountain pipe exists already & might also be worth a 'doubling' or so.
Ray



To: Bearcatbob who wrote (152294)6/7/2011 1:57:08 PM
From: LoneClone14 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 206160
 
"The ideological warriors are both our friend and enemy on this issue."

Let me remind you that you are one of those ideological warriors, in fact one of the most fervid and unbending I have ever come across. You seem to forget that sometimes, no surprise really as that is one of the most common characteristics of ideological warriors of all stripes.

LC


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News