To: Chas. who wrote (4003 ) 11/16/1997 8:54:00 PM From: paul centis Read Replies (2) | Respond to
Chuck! Just out of curiosity of course, how many mineral trains does winspear have? Or, even better, how many pipes does winspear have? Compare the answer to these 2 simple questions as they apply to both WSP and its so-called great geology vs. MPV and what you refer to as "skimpy geology" ha ha ha! I just can't stop laughing! By the way, as I see it, many people on this thread respect your opinion and I think that is great. I think we are somewhat similar in that we both enjoy being very thorough in our research. However, what confuses me is when someone as "thorough" as yourself refers to a $0.70share stock such as WSP as having great geology. Where is this "great geology" you refer to? I will admit that WSP does have "interesting geology" and they do have diamonds in dykes and kimberlite float but, without kimberlite pipes of economic value this "great geology " is not yet proven. I still hope that winspear is successfull, as it would just add to the viability of the entire area. On the other hand MPV's (what you refer to as "skimpy geology") has so far produced 4 very promising pipes from just one mineral train located on the property. At least 8 to 10 more trains containing favourable G-10 garnets remain to be drilled! Some of these trains contain better indicator mineral chemistry than the original train containing the 4 discovered pipes. If MPV has "skimpy geology" with 4 pipes and 4 mini-bulk samples to be conducted by "DEBEERS" than what does WSP have again? After looking at these facts, I do not understand your reasoning. Gee... maybe its me .... maybe I just don't understand HYPE! Best regards, Paul!
