To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (102693 ) 6/7/2011 2:58:21 PM From: Jim Mullens 1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 197287 Art, re: QCOM long term growth rate’’ I think that 15% increase in revenues is small potatoes” Art, it’s not just a 15% increase, it’s compounding that 15% increase over 5 years which results in a doubling of revenue / EPS over that time. Just wanted to make sure we’re on the same page, as awhile back the board had a Snapdragon discussion going in which your Snapdragon estimate was off by a magnitude of about 10 fold (1,000%). So, if a 15% five year CAGR is “small potatoes” / “nothing to write home about” in your estimation…. What (approximately) would please you from QCOM over the next 5 years, considering- …+ current macro economic issues (U.S. / World is still “recovering” from biggest meltdown since the great depression). …+ QCOM is no longer a start-up company ($94B market cap) …+ It’s **not** the booming 1990’s / QCOM is **not** a dominant company. Re: ” I just read today that the new Toshiba tablet will use a Tegra2 processor, not a Snapdragon. ” … Are your expectations that Snapdragon capture close to every design win out there…not being satisfied with 150 wins in production and another 250 on the way?????????????? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Note- several other dominant large cap tech companies metrics (yahoo) …………….Market Cap- $B…. LT Growth % QCOM…...$098B………………18% MSFT……..$202……………….10% INTC………$118……………....12% CSCO……..$086……………….10% AAPL………$309……………….21% GOOG…….$168……………….18% BRCM……..$018……………….16% SNDK……...$007……………….13% (frequent AB poster) From my perspective I don’t find many well established, dominant, large cap tech companies matching QCOM long term growth prospects. Again, would you care to name several of the large cap companies that you manage that match QCOM’s long term growth prospects (better than "small potatoes) ?