SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (8432)6/7/2011 3:21:14 PM
From: TimF2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 13056
 

None of those are predominant


Did you actually read the link?

"This system covers nearly 90% of its students."

"Most schools in Ireland are state-aided parish schools" (Different system, but still government paid private schools)

"n the Netherlands, the "school struggle" (schoolstrijd) concluded in 1917 with public and private schools being given equal financial status under the constitution,[4] leading to a de facto system of school vouchers.[58] For more than 80 years, parents have preferred independent schools. Today, around 70% of primary and secondary pupils attend independent schools."

Hong Kong has a predominant voucher system, just excluding for profit schools (which is a bit odd of Hong Kong historically, and doesn't make much sense to me, but which is a predominant voucher system)

Sweden has a non-predominant system, but its still ten percent of students, rather than a very small percent like in the US

Centralizing and socializing are not just the instincts of politicians, they are the instincts of humans.

Only humans that are political players. I don't mean that politics changes them (although it can, and probably often does) but it is human instinct to try to control things if you have the power to do so. Its also human instinct to resist such control, but the ones with the power make the political decisions, so control frequently expands.