SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/8/2011 10:51:34 AM
From: TideGlider3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224738
 
WOW! That will help Obama! Save it Kenny! Bring it to the polls when you vote.

In fact send it to Weiner, Pelosi and Reid too!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/8/2011 11:09:10 AM
From: TideGlider1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224738
 
QE2 failed




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/8/2011 11:35:07 AM
From: chartseer3 Recommendations  Respond to of 224738
 
What was the unemployment rate when newsweek took that poll?
Welcome back I thought you threw in the towel and was just hunkered down some savoring your weiner photos.

citizen chartseer



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/8/2011 3:19:00 PM
From: chartseer2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224738
 
Didn't the whole newsweek magazine corporation recently get sold for a dollar, a single solitary dollar? Does that tell you anything about the quality of the magazine or the worth of it's surveys?

citizen chartseer



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/8/2011 3:25:34 PM
From: locogringo5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224738
 
Judges sharply challenge healthcare law

Atlanta— A top Obama administration lawyer defending last year's healthcare law ran into skeptical questions Wednesday from three federal judges here, who suggested they may be ready to declare all or part of the law unconstitutional....

And in an ominous sign for the administration, the judges opened the arguments by saying they knew of no case in American history where the courts had upheld the government's power to force someone to buy a product...."I can't find any case like this," said Chief Judge Joel Dubina of the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals. "If we uphold this, are there any limits" on the power of the federal government? he asked.

Judge Stanley Marcus appeared to agree. "I can't find any case" in the past where the courts upheld "telling a private person they are compelled to purchase a product in the open market…. Is there anything that suggests Congress can do this?"

latimes.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/8/2011 3:53:50 PM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224738
 
US judges seem receptive to health care challenge
Below:

+-ATLANTA — Judges on a federal appeals court panel on Wednesday repeatedly raised questions about President Barack Obama's health care overhaul, expressing unease with the requirement that virtually all Americans carry health insurance or face penalties.

All three judges on the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals panel questioned whether upholding the landmark law could open the door to Congress adopting other sweeping economic mandates. The panel is made up of two Democratic appointees and one Republican appointee.

The Atlanta panel did not immediately rule on the lawsuit brought by 26 states, a coalition of small businesses and private individuals who urged the three to side with a Florida judge who struck down the law. And it's never easy to predict how an appeals panel will decide.

But during almost three hours of oral arguments, the judges asked pointed questions about the so-called individual mandate, which the federal government says is needed to expand coverage to tens of millions of uninsured Americans. With other challenges to the law before other federal appeals courts, lawyers expect that its fate will ultimately be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Chief Judge Joel Dubina, who was tapped by President George H.W. Bush, struck early by asking the government's attorney "if we uphold the individual mandate in this case, are there any limits on Congressional power?" Circuit Judges Frank Hull and Stanley Marcus, who were both appointed by President Bill Clinton, echoed his concerns later in the hearing.

Acting U.S. Solicitor Neal Katyal sought to ease their concerns by saying the legislative branch can only exercise its powers to regulate commerce if it will have a substantial effect on the economy and solve a national, not local, problem. Health care coverage, he said, is unique because of the billions of dollars shifted in the economy when Americans without coverage seek medical care.

"That's what stops the slippery slope," he said.

.Paul Clement, a former U.S. solicitor representing the states, countered that the federal government should not have the power to "compel you from buying coverage." He said lawmakers have clearly abused a power that for "220 years Congress never saw fit to use."

Hull also seemed skeptical at the government's claim that the mandate was crucial to covering the 50 million or so uninsured Americans. She said the rolls of the uninsured could be pared significantly with other parts of the package, including expanded Medicare discounts for some seniors and a change that makes it easier for those with pre-existing medical conditions to get coverage. Dubina nodded as she spoke.

Hull and Dubina also asked the attorneys to chart a theoretical path of what could happen to the overhaul if the individual mandate were struck down but the rest of the package was upheld.

Much of the remaining portions of the law should still be allowed to stand, said Katyal, but he warned the judges they'd make a "deep, deep mistake" if the insurance requirement were found to be unconstitutional.

Only on msnbc.com for msnbc.com
After tsunami, elderly couple rebuilds a 'small life' .
AP
Updated 33 minutes ago 6/8/2011 7:17:40 PM +00:00 Proposal could shut many out of housing market .
AP
Surprising Chrysler makes most of second chance .

NBC's Kerry Sanders on the Casey Anthony trial .
Press Association via AP, file
Scotland to split from UK and 'be a nation again'? .
Provided by Christopher Mullins-Silverstein
An all-American turns Scottish nationalist .
Red Tape: Should 10-year-olds use Facebook?
..Clement, however, argued the insurance requirement is the "driving force" of the broader package.

"If you take out the hub, the spokes will fall," Clement said.

Marcus, meanwhile, said the case struck him as an argument over individual liberties, but questioned whether the judicial branch should "stop at the water's edge" or intervene.

The 11th Circuit is not the first appeals court to hear arguments about the constitutionality of the federal health care overhaul, as panels in Cincinnati and Richmond have both heard similar legal challenges to the law within the last month. But legal observers say the Atlanta panel's decision could be the most pivotal because the ruling by U.S. District Judge Roger Vinson of Florida is considered the broadest assault yet on the law.

While a Republican-appointed federal judge in Virginia struck down the requirement that nearly all Americans carry health insurance, Vinson invalidated the entire law, from the Medicare expansion to a change that allows adult children up to age 26 to remain on their parents' insurance. Three federal judges, all Democratic appointees, have upheld the law.

The arguments unfolded in what's considered one of the nation's most conservative appeals courts. But the randomly selected panel represents different judicial perspective. None of the three are considered either stalwart conservatives or unfailing liberals.

Dubina, who was first tapped to the bench as a federal magistrate in 1983, is not considered to be as reflexively conservative as some of his colleagues. But he's under particular scrutiny because of his daughter's outspoken opposition to the health care overhaul. U.S. Rep. Martha Dubina Roby, a Montgomery, Ala., Republican elected in November, voted to repeal the health care ban because she said it was "less about providing health care for all citizens, and more about expanding federal government."

The other two judges aren't easy to pin down either. Marcus was first nominated by Republican Ronald Reagan to serve on the Florida bench after several years as Miami's lead federal prosecutor; he was later elevated by Clinton. And Hull, a former county judge in Atlanta, is known for subjecting both sides of the counsel table with challenging questions.

Advertise | AdChoicesAdvertise | AdChoices
Advertise | AdChoices
.A crush of people gathered outside the 11th Circuit nearly three hours before the arguments were held to guarantee a spot, and the court opened an adjoining courtroom for the spillover crowd. The cramped room was packed with high-profile attorneys and politicians, including Georgia Attorney General Sam Olens, who sat in the front row. In a rare move, the court decided to sell $26 audiotapes of the arguments for those who missed out.

As the arguments took place, about 75 people staged a rally outside the downtown Atlanta building urging the appeals court to strike the law down, waving signs including one that read "Hands Off My Health Care."

When the panel does issue a decision — and it could be months — there's a chance the full 11-judge court could decide to review the ruling. But everyone in the courtroom — the judges included — knew the debate would eventually land in the Supreme Court.

"I doubt this is the last time we'll be arguing this case," Dubina said. "Maybe next time we'll be in Washington."

___http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/43329410



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/9/2011 7:37:47 AM
From: lorne1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224738
 
Muslim says chopping off hands is 'compassionate'
Advocates Shariah law as standard for all Egyptians
June 09, 2011
By Bob Unruh
wnd.com

The "democratic" revolution in Egypt has been suspected by Westerners of being a front for an Islamic takeover, and now a report has surfaced that a key Egyptian cleric, Mas'oud Anwar, has advocated for adoption of Islamic Shariah law as the nation's new standard resulting from that revolution.

WND previously has reported how Muslims in Egypt are becoming more and more aggressive in their attacks on Christians and Christian churches.

The presentation by Anwar, on Al-Rahma Television, explains how imposing draconian penalties such as chopping hands off suspected thieves and stoning for adultery really is the "compassionate" thing to do.

"The punishment decreed by the Shariah serve as deterrents," Anwar explained, according to a report from the Middle East Media Research Institute. The organization monitors and reports on what is the subject of conversation on media in the region.

Anwar explained the logic of Shariah:

"If someone contemplates fornication, but then he sees that on Friday, at Al-Tahrir Square, the police caught an unmarried fornicator, gave him 100 lashings and the entire thing was broadcast live on TV… Would he dare to commit fornication? He would say to himself: 'Oh my God, I don't need this.' He'd say: 'I'd better fast, like the Prophet Muhammad instructed.' That's it."

Continued Anwar, "If the Islamic punishment is implemented, the alcoholics will go to jail. Take a highway robber, a criminal, or a drug dealer – the haraba punishment on him [an Islamic punishment: to be put to death, or crucified, or have an arm and a leg chopped off on alternative sides, or to be banished]. That way, the world will be clean and more organized. […]

"My Muslim brothers, the compassion about which the secular speak, when they say that there is no compassion in Islamic law and that its punishments are barbaric, is nothing but ludicrous compassion," he said.

"Wisdom and compassion require that a killer be put to death, that a married adulterer be stoned, and that the hand of a thief be chopped off. That is true compassion. Chopping off the treacherous hand of a thief, to protect the entire nation, is compassion, mercy, and wisdom. "

He said the West could benefit from the application of Shariah.

"I have with me statistics on crime in the West and in Arab countries, including Egypt. These figures are alarming. Why is there a rise in crime? Why is there an increasing number of prisons and prisoners! It is because the Shariah is not implemented."

Anwar said, "The thief is a cancer in society, and so are all the sinners. Their treatment is to be punished in accordance with the strict, judicious, and merciful law of Allah. The chopping off of a single treacherous hand guarantees the safety of the country and society in its entirety – it guarantees its security, its blood, its money, and its honor. That is what compassion means."

He likened crime to disease.

"Brothers, may God bless all the Muslims with good health. Take somebody who is told that he has cancer in his arm, and when he goes to the doctor, the doctor tells him that the only way to prevent his death is to amputate his arm. What is left for him to do? He holds his arm out to the doctor, and the doctor amputates it. When the patient awakens from the anesthesia, he says to the doctor: 'May Allah reward you, you saved my life.' The amputation is an act of mercy, and the patient thanks the doctor for it."

"And you tell me that Islamic law is barbaric? What barbarism? It is full of compassion," he said.

MEMRI also reported that there have been a growing number of "clashes" between Muslims and Coptic Christians, and "attacks on Coptic churches have increased."

In March, there were riots in Sol and in the Helwan Governorate, as well as attacks by Salafists (Muslims) who cut off the ear of a Christian.

In April, a quarrel over a building sparked clashes that saw a number of homes belonging to Christians burned. And in May, Muslims demonstrated against the opening of a church.

More than a dozen Christians were killed and hundreds wounded, the reports said.

There have been numerous demonstrations throughout Egypt since then.

The regional Hurriyet Daily News quoted the Muslim Brotherhood explaining that concerns about an Islamic state to replace the regime of ousted President Hosni Mubarak are unnecessary.

For one thing, said Ashraf Abdel Ghaffar, a leader of the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood, said Shariah already is in the Egyptian constitution.

"If you go to any court in Egypt, they implement Shariah first. This is more than enough for us," he told the Daily News.

But at the CreepingSharia blog, an analysis noted that the riots in Egypt had nothing to do with "democracy."

"Their version of freedom means voting in Islamic law," the commentary said. "Seventy-seven percent of Egyptians approved constitutional amendments drafted in part by the radical Muslim Brotherhood.

"The platform of the Cairo-based Brotherhood's new Freedom and Justice Party – as pleasing as the name may sound to Western ears – bars women and Christians from the presidency. It also establishes a board of Muslim clerics (read: Talibanesque mullahs) to oversee the government."

Another leading Muslim Brotherhood figure, Sobhi Saleh, was straightforward about the plans.

"Islamic Shariah is the best system for Muslims and non-Muslims," he said.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/9/2011 7:47:22 AM
From: lorne1 Recommendation  Respond to of 224738
 
kenny...Wonder is any abomba bombs caused this?

Gadhafi's daughter files war crimes lawsuit against NATO
Aisha Gadhafi lost her infant daughter, brother and nephew in an April 30 attack on the Libyan leader's compound.
By DPA
haaretz.com

Muammar Gadhafi's daughter has filed a war crimes lawsuit in Belgium over the April 30 NATO attack on the Libyan leader's compound, in which her infant daughter, brother and two nephews were killed, a newspaper reported on Wednesday.

Aisha Gaddafi reportedly filed the complaint under Belgium's "universal competence" law, war crimes or genocide suits can be brought against foreign leaders, as long as a connection can be established between Belgium and the defendant.

"We think that bombing a civilian home where a man and three children were living is not part of the mandate given to the members of the United Nations by the Security Council resolutions on Libya, "Luc Brossolet, a French lawyer acting for Aisha Gaddafi, told Belgium's Le Soir newspaper.

On April 30, NATO planes enforcing a no fly zone over Libya bombed Muammar Gadhafi's Tripoli compound, killing Saif al-Arab, his four-month-old granddaughter Mastoura and grandson's Seif and Carthage, both aged two.

NATO says it is bombing Gadhafi's "command and control centres: - including the Bab al-Aziziya compound - to prevent the government from plotting attacks against civilians, in line with its UN mandate.

"The fact that NATO has its seat in the Belgian capital is enough to place the military alliance under Belgian jurisdiction," Brossolet said.

But law expert Francois Dubuisson from Brussels' Free University (ULB) told Le Soir that as an international organization, NATO "enjoys immunity from prosecution."

Under a previous version of the universal competence law, which did not require connections with Belgium to be established, lawsuits targeted then US President George W. Bush and other administration official over the Iraq war, causing significant friction between the US and Belgium. The suits were all thrown out by Belgian magistrates.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/9/2011 8:03:30 AM
From: lorne  Respond to of 224738
 
ken...do you already have this photo...you should share your weiner photo collection with the thread?




To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/9/2011 8:35:45 AM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 224738
 
Imports were down slightly because people can't afford to drive as much and oil imports reflect that. The unemployment numbers were slightly higher, but remain elevated.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/9/2011 10:02:52 AM
From: locogringo2 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224738
 
You better hurry up to this this restaurant, kenny_troll. This is as good as his promise about Caterpillar Co hiring people. Does your phony hero EVER tell the TRUTH, or is he just like you?

Ohio restaurant referenced by Obama is closing

An Ohio restaurant mentioned last week by President Barack Obama as an indirect beneficiary of the government's Chrysler bailout will go out of business Sunday after a more than 70-year history. Co-owner Richard Lawrence of New Chet's Restaurant in Toledo says business has fallen victim to the economy and the workplace smoking ban approved by Ohio voters in 2006. (snip)Obama visited the plant on Friday and told workers that without them, who would eat at Chet's or patronize other local businesses.

cleveland.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/9/2011 10:55:01 AM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations  Respond to of 224738
 
75% Support Showing Photo ID At The Polls
Thursday, June 09, 2011 Email to a Friend ShareThis.AdvertisementSupport remains high for requiring voters to show photo identification before being allowed to cast their ballots. An increasing number of states across the country are putting that requirement into law.

A new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 75% of Likely U.S. Voters believe voters should be required to show photo identification such as a driver’s license before being allowed to vote. Just 18% disagree and oppose such a requirement. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Eighty-five percent (85%) of Republicans support a photo ID requirement at the polls, as do 77% of voters not affiliated with either major party and 63% of Democrats. But then support for such a law is high across virtually all demographic groups.

Supporters of photo ID laws say they will prevent fraud at the polls; opponents insist the laws will discourage many including minorities and older Americans from voting.

By a 48% to 29% margin, voters think that letting ineligible people vote is a bigger problem than preventing legitimate voters from casting a ballot.

A plurality (46%) of Democrats thinks it’s more common for eligible voters to be denied their right to vote. Seventy-two percent (72%) of Republicans and a plurality (44%) of voters not affiliated with either party, on the other hand, believe that illegal voting is more prevalent.

Only one percent (1%) say they have ever been illegally denied the right to vote.

(Want a free daily e-mail update? If it's in the news, it's in our polls). Rasmussen Reports updates are also available on Twitter or Facebook.

The survey of 1,000 Likely Voters was conducted on June 6-8, 2011 by Rasmussen Reports. The margin of sampling error is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Field work for all Rasmussen Reports surveys is conducted by Pulse Opinion Research, LLC. See methodology.

Just after last November’s elections, 17% of voters believed large numbers of people were allowed to vote who were not eligible to vote. Forty-three percent (43%) said that wasn’t the case, but nearly as many (40%) weren’t sure.

Support for showing photo ID prior to voting has ranged from 75% to 82% since June 2006.

The Political Class, however, is not so sure. While 84% of Mainstream voters believe voters should be required to show photo identification before being allowed to vote, those in the Political Class are evenly divided on the question.

Similarly, while most Mainstream voters (54%) say it’s more common for people to vote illegally than for legal voters to be denied their right to vote, the Political Class is evenly divided.

Just 54% of voters now think American elections are fair. Fifty-three percent (53%) feel most members of Congress get reelected because election rules are rigged to benefit incumbents. Only 17% believe most congressmen get reelected because of the good job they do representing their constituents.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/9/2011 11:01:23 AM
From: locogringo5 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224738
 
How can you support these slimy people, kenny_troll? How can you call these freaks your friends?

Pure Class: Wisconsin Leftists Disrupt Special Olympics Ceremony to Picket Scott Walker

townhall.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/9/2011 3:51:13 PM
From: chartseer  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224738
 
Kenny from brilliant barry's foreign policies in the mid east would you guess his muslim relatives were sunni or shite?

citizen chartseer



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/10/2011 9:59:44 AM
From: TideGlider4 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224738
 
Durbin and Carvel say Obama owns the economy now. Carvel says Obama needs to go to Camp David and get a lesson in economics.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/10/2011 10:27:21 AM
From: TideGlider4 Recommendations  Respond to of 224738
 
More bad news for ObamaCare
STEVE HUNTLEY shuntley.cst@gmail.com Jun 10, 2011 02:13AM
Reprints7ShareAs if President Barack Obama didn’t have enough re-election headaches with the nearly daily reports of dreary economic news, now comes a new harsh assessment of his signature legislative achievement, ObamaCare.

A survey of 1,300 employers by the consulting firm McKinsey & Co. found that 30 percent say they likely will drop worker health-care coverage after the major provisions of the “Affordable Care Act” come into force in 2014. A central promise in Obama’s campaign to win passage of the act was that if you like your insurance, you wouldn’t lose it under ObamaCare. Republicans, think tanks such as the Heritage Foundation and other critics challenged that claim but were dismissed as Democrats rammed the measure through Congress on a partisan vote.

Now the McKinsey survey confirms the warnings. What’s more, it found that among employers most knowledgeable about the details of the health-care overhaul, more than 50 percent said they were likely to drop coverage for their workers.

Remember the famous words of then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi? She said we had to pass ObamaCare to learn what’s in it. If the McKinsey survey is any guide, the more Americans learn about ObamaCare, the less they like it.

This wasn’t the first indication of trouble with the health-care overhaul. Its backers claimed 400,000 people with pre-existing conditions — usually uninsurable under the current system — would flock to ObamaCare’s high-risk pools. Only 18,000 had signed up by March.

Worse was the revelation that the act’s expensive requirements threatened current coverage for millions of Americans. The administration had to respond by granting waivers to 1,372 employers, unions and insurance companies.

No waivers will be permitted in 2014, when the law’s heavy-hitting provisions kick in requiring all but the smallest businesses to have medical coverage for employers or face a fine. The McKinsey findings indicate employers see economic benefits in paying the fine, increasing pay for their workers and letting them go to ObamaCare’s insurance exchanges to find coverage.

Despite Pelosi’s optimistic predictions, polls have rarely found an improvement in ObamaCare’s standing as voters learn more about it. And the passions of its opponents remain intense. That’s why it will be an important campaign issue in 2012, though how crucial may hinge on who Obama’s Republican opponent is.

The issue is a tough one for Mitt Romney, now leading in GOP polling (though not by a lot). As governor of Massachusetts, he championed a health-care reform measure much like the national act. Romney defends the program as a solution specific to the needs of Massachusetts and says other states should be free to pursue their own answers to their health-care insurance issues. He condemns ObamaCare as a failed one-size-fits-all solution that should be scrapped.

The central issue of the campaign will be the economy and jobs. There Romney has impressive credentials as a successful businessman, governor and problem solver who saved the 2002 Salt Lake City Olympics from financial ruin.

One attractive alternative to Romney is former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, free of a Romneycare-type handicap. Pawlenty on Tuesday laid out an ambitious economic recovery program based on tried-and-true Ronald Reagan principles of lower tax rates, less federal spending and regulatory reform. His program won praise from conservative and business circles. The White House’s reflexive attack on it only underscored how the administration’s policies have failed.

While jobs will be issue one in 2012, ObamaCare, its big-government philosophy, its unpopular individual mandate and the partisan way it was forced through Congress highlight what’s wrong with the Obama presidency. It may give Pawlenty an edge over Romney as GOP primary voters get down to the serious business of picking a serious challenger to Obama.
suntimes.com



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/10/2011 10:33:21 AM
From: TideGlider2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224738
 
DOW under 12k again...hope it doesn't stay there. Obama needs to get schooled in economics!



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/10/2011 2:19:54 PM
From: TideGlider  Respond to of 224738
 
Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
Friday, June 10, 2011 Email to a Friend ShareThis.AdvertisementThe Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Friday shows that 23% of the nation's voters Strongly Approve of the way that Barack Obama is performing his role as president. Thirty-eight percent (38%) Strongly Disapprove, giving Obama a Presidential Approval Index rating of -15 (see trends).

Confidence in the War on Terror remains high. Fifty percent (50%) believe the U.S. and its allies are winning while just 15% believe the terrorists now have the advantage. Prior to the killing of Osama bin Laden, just 32% thought the U.S. and its allies were winning. Following the bin Laden news, that optimism jumped to 55%.

Just 48% have confidence in the stability of the U.S. banking system. That figure has been fairly stable in 2011 and is up slightly from 2010. However, it is well below the 68% level of confidence measured in 2008.

Sixty-seven percent (67%) currently believe the U.S. economy is in a recession.

The Presidential Approval Index is calculated by subtracting the number who Strongly Disapprove from the number who Strongly Approve. It is updated daily at 9:30 a.m. Eastern (sign up for free daily e-mail update). Updates are also available on Twitter and Facebook.

Overall, 47% of voters say they at least somewhat approve of the president's performance. Fifty-three percent (53%) at least somewhat disapprove.

Eighty-one percent (81%) of Democrats approve while 85% of Republicans disapprove. Among those not affiliated with either major party, 45% approve and 54% disapprove.

Seventy-five percent (75%) believe voters should be required to show photo identification before casting a ballot.

(More Below)



A Wall Street Journal profile calls Scott Rasmussen "America's Insurgent Pollster."The Washington Post calls him "a driving force in American politics." If you'd like Scott to speak at your conference or event, contact Premiere Speakers Bureau. Follow Scott on Facebook.

In a book released last year, Scott observed that "the gap between Americans who want to govern themselves and politicians who want to rule over them may be as big today as the gap between the colonies and England during the 18th century." He added that "the American people don't want to be governed from the left, the right, or the center. They want to govern themselves." In Search of Self-Governance is available at Amazon.com.

MAD AS HELL: How the Tea Party Movement is Fundamentally Remaking Our Two-Party System, by Scott Rasmussen and Doug Schoen, can be ordered at Amazon.com, Barnes and Noble, Borders and other outlets. It's also available in bookstores everywhere.

It is important to remember that the Rasmussen Reports job approval ratings are based upon a sample of likely voters. Some other firms base their approval ratings on samples of all adults. Obama's numbers are always several points higher in a poll of adults rather than likely voters. That's because some of the president's most enthusiastic supporters, such as young adults, are less likely to turn out to vote. It is also important to check the details of question wording when comparing approval ratings from different firms.

(More Below)



Rasmussen Reports has been a pioneer in the use of automated telephone polling techniques, but many other firms still utilize their own operator-assisted technology (see methodology). Pollsters for Presidents Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton have cited our "unchallenged record for both integrity and accuracy."

The Pew Center noted that Rasmussen Reports beat traditional media in covering Scott Brown's upset win in Massachusetts earlier this year: "It was polling-not journalistic reporting-that caught the wave in the race to succeed Massachusetts Senator Edward M. Kennedy." Rasmussen Reports was also the first to show Joe Sestak catching Arlen Specter in the Pennsylvania Democratic Primary race last year.

Once again in 2010, Rasmussen Reports polling provided an accurate preview of Election Night outcomes. See how we did.

Larry Sabato, director of the Center for Politics at the University of Virginia, noted, “This was one tough election to poll and forecast. Rasmussen Reports caught the major trends of the election year nationally and in most states.”

In December 2009, a full 11 months before Election Day. A Democratic strategist concluded that if the Rasmussen Reports Generic Congressional Ballot data was accurate, Republicans would gain 62 seats in the House during the 2010 elections. Other polls at the time suggested the Democrats would retain a comfortable majority. The Republicans gained 63 seats in the 2010 elections.

Rasmussen’s final 2010 projections were published in the Wall Street Journal. Scott Rasmussen noted that “it would be wise for all Republicans to remember that their team didn't win, the other team lost. Heading into 2012, voters will remain ready to vote against the party in power unless they are given a reason not to do so.”

In the 2009 New Jersey Governor's race, automated polls tended to be more accurate than operator-assisted polling techniques. On reviewing the state polling results from 2009, Mickey Kaus offered this assessment, "If you have a choice between Rasmussen and, say, the prestigious N.Y. Times, go with Rasmussen!"

In 2008, Obama won 53%-46% and our final poll showed Obama winning 52% to 46%. While we were pleased with the final result, Rasmussen Reports was especially pleased with the stability of our results. On every single day for the last six weeks of the campaign, our daily tracking showed Obama with a stable and solid lead attracting more than 50% of the vote.

We also have provided a summary of our 2008 state-by-state presidential results for your review.

In 2004 George W. Bush received 50.7% of the vote while John Kerry earned 48.3%. Rasmussen Reports polling projected that Bush would win 50.2% to 48.5%. We were the only firm to project both candidates' totals within half a percentage point by (see our 2004 results).

See also our 2008 state results for Senate and governor.

See 2006 results for Senate and Governor.

Daily tracking results are collected via telephone surveys of 500 likely voters per night and reported on a three-day rolling average basis. To reach those who have abandoned traditional landline telephones, Rasmussen Reports uses an online survey tool to interview randomly selected participants from a demographically diverse panel. The margin of sampling error for the full sample of 1,500 Likely Voters is +/- 3 percentage points with a 95% level of confidence. Results are also compiled on a full-week basis and crosstabs for full-week results are available for Platinum Members.

Like all polling firms, Rasmussen Reports weights its data to reflect the population at large (see methodology). Among other targets, Rasmussen Reports weights data by political party affiliation using a dynamic weighting process. While partisan affiliation is generally quite stable over time, there are a fair number of people who waver between allegiance to a particular party or independent status. Our baseline targets are established based upon separate survey interviews with a sample of adults nationwide completed during the preceding three months (a total of 45,000 interviews) and targets are updated monthly.

Currently, the baseline targets for the adult population are 34.3% Democrats, 34.8% Republicans and 30.9% unaffiliated. Likely voter samples typically show a slightly larger advantage for the Republicans.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/10/2011 5:37:31 PM
From: lorne3 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 224738
 
Senate candidate says 'constitutional crisis' Obama's fault
'I call him the lawless president because he doesn't seem to have respect for the law'
June 10, 2011
By Bob Unruh
© 2011 WND
wnd.com

Virginia Senate candidate E.W. Jackson

A candidate for U.S. Senate from Virginia says he calls Barack Obama the "lawless president" because "he doesn't seem to have any respect for the law."

The attack comes from E.W. Jackson, who is seeking the GOP nomination to replace the outgoing Democratic Sen. James Webb.

"We're in a constitutional crisis," Jackson declares in a new YouTube video.

"I've been following presidents for a long time. I have never seen a president use regulatory and executive power to end-run the Constitution, to end-run the legislature, even to end run the judiciary," he said.

"He can't get cap-and-trade passed so what does he do? He relies on EPA to pass these inhibitive, prohibitive regulations that will in effect implement cap-and-trade without any legislative action," Jackson said.

His statements...video:
youtube.com

Republican George Allen and Democrat Tim Kaine are regarded as probable contenders for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by Webb, but the primaries still are a year away, and comments like Jackson's are starting to generate considerable notice in the state.

In his recent speech, Jackson virtually ignored his potential primary or general election opponents, instead choosing to take on Obama.

"He can't get regulations that he wants to pass on a whole variety of issues. Card check. So he appoints somebody to the NLRB who is going to try to implement card check through the back door," Jackson said.

"He can't get the legislature to go along with some sort of broad moratorium on drilling. He doesn't have the votes. So what's he do? He does it by executive authority. Right now you've got people down on the Gulf right now unemployed. Hurting. Because this man has implemented a moratorium on deepwater drilling on the Gulf. Put thousands of people out of work. And when the judge declared what he did was illegal and ordered his administration to lift the moratorium, he said, 'Well, we're studying it.'"

Jackson continued, "Right now they're in contempt of court for violation of a judge's order. And there's no indication whatsoever that they're about to back up. I call him the lawless president because he doesn't seem to have any respect for the law."

He noted that, "Instead of him applauding Arizona for their willingness to try to implement and to enforce federal immigration law, what does he do? He attacks them. Says they're the ones behaving in some sort of questionable fashion, when he ought to be right there backing them up."

Campaign officials said the video had attracted thousands of viewers during just the first 24 hours it was posted. Jackson has been getting the attention of tea party groups for his promise never to vote to raise the debt ceiling, his pro-family and pro-life advocacy positions, and his experience.

A Marine veteran who graduated Summa Cum Laude from the University of Massachusetts at Boston as well as Harvard Law, he also studied at Harvard Divinity School.

He practice law in Boston, moving later into fulltime ministry and writing "Ten Commandments to an Extraordinary Life" as well as "American the Beautiful – Reflections of a Patriot Descended from Slaves."

He also founded Exodus Faith Ministries, a nondenominational Christian church in Chesapeake, Va. On July 4, 2009, he launched STAND – Staying True to America's National Destiny, a national grassroots organization dedicated to restoring America's Judeo-Christian heritage and values.

Jackson started Boston's first and only all-gospel radio station. He also taught administrative law at Northeastern University in Boston and business and commercial law at Strayer University in Virginia.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (106058)6/10/2011 6:01:49 PM
From: locogringo3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 224738
 
Dow falls below 12k; stocks drop 6 weeks straight

Thanks kenny and obama............two royal FAILURES