To: Art Bechhoefer who wrote (102739 ) 6/10/2011 12:05:25 PM From: Jim Mullens Respond to of 197299 Art, re: QCOM LG growth potential- continued Earnings growth of 20% or more, year over year for the next five years would be acceptable and reminiscent of Intel back in the 1990s. This should be possible because Qualcomm has the most comprehensive set of patents that appear to be essential for wireless communications during the next five years. Incidentally, FWIW, if Qualcomm used its excess cash to buy back shares, it would approach 20% earnings increases, and would exceed the 20% rate if it chose to further reduce its cash by taking on some debt. >>>>>>>>>>>Reminiscing ….. 1990’s the good old days……Then / Them (INTC / WINTEL) >>>> + INTC (MSFT) had a lock on the booming PC industry (WINTEL) with their business model (business practices ---monopoly ?? – fair / unfair??) + Macro economic conditions were great plus the Internet boom, Y2K, market bubble, etc, etc. Today / reality + Far different global macro economic conditions including equity metrics (PEs / PEGs, etc). + Unlike WINTEL, QCOMs business model was vigorously / unrelentingly attacked in the U.S. and globally by the largest, most powerful / rich industry incumbents, their lobbyists, their “friends” in the media, **and** their “friends” in governments (Europe / Korea / Japan/ India, elsewhere). …. Basically, a single company with world changing / beneficial technology with a fair & reasonable business model (more than fair by mQ / most of us)…..at “war with the world”. ………………..( Perhaps with the WINTEL experience, world opinion was against a similar repeat with QCOM?) ….What to do… ……+ Keep fighting the good fight against insurmountable odds (money / distorted world opinion, etc) ……….+ mounting worldwide legal expenses???? ……….+ sustaining 2G (non- QCOM bearing $) while delaying 3G advances / deployments??? …………….(perhaps even long enough to bypass 3G and move to 4G w/ less QCOM essential patents and lower royalty rates) …..+ Settle with NOK (and others- Samsung, etc) at a lower than prevailing royalty rate ………….While very, very disappointing to us (lowering our potential returns significantly ...20% >> 15%??) So here we be, Not quite as good as it could have been, but life’s not always fair. Being realistic, - …..+ I don’t think a 15% long term growth rate (w/ an increasing 1%+ annual dividend) is in any sense “small potatoes” …..+ Sure, thru my “rosey colored glassed” I expected / hoped for more. …..+ Hopefully / maybe we’ll see your 20% CAGR …. That’s still a possibility with new Mirasol / Atheros markets and Q’s remarkable team relentlessly driving execution in core markets ………+ 3GSM / WCDMA chipset share gains, ………+ Snapdragon gains in- ………….+ Smartphones ………….+ tablets ………….+ Notebooks / PCs with QCOM / ARM processors cracking the WINTEL code. p.s. WRT share buybacks with “excess” cash……. Remember the big chunk off-shore subject to a **big** tax hit.