Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Technical analysis for shorts & longs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Johnny Canuck who wrote (46772)	6/9/2011 9:17:09 PM
From: Johnny Canuck	1 Recommendation Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 70275

The real problem with Vancouver’s outrageous house prices The international media have finally clued in to the wackiness on Canada's west coast, otherwise known as the Vancouver real estate market. Last month Bloomberg noted that when compared to median household incomes Vancouver homes are more expensive than even New York. The story linked soaring prices to the influx of wealthy buyers from mainland China. Today the Wall Street Journal retraces the exact same material. The warning in both pieces is clear: Vancouver's housing market has become disconnected from reality and is primed to crash. This is a well worn theme for many Canadian reporters. Here at Maclean's we've reached the same conclusion several times going back to 2008, and, admittedly, we've been proven fully and completely wrong. I still think prices here in Vancouver are nuts, but each day as I walk to work past the high-end coffee shops and panhandlers I see more "For Sale" signs going up, along with plenty of "Sold" stickers, too. But here's the thing. The real threat to Vancouver isn't that the housing market might crash. That's happened here before. It undoubtedly will happen again. Such is the boom & bust nature of real estate in Lotusland. Far more insidious is the impact housing unaffordability is having on employers and the broader economy. You hear stories of smart, young people leaving for jobs elsewhere. At the same time smart, young people from elsewhere aren't coming here for jobs. The price of real estate and cost of living are too high, while pay is simply too low relative to other parts of the country. Business in Vancouver, a local newsweekly, delves into the dilemma in its latest issue with the story "Home truths hurt talent search." (You need a subscription to read the story online but here's the lead.) To take a job in Vancouver, Calgary-based senior information management consultant Joey Roa would have to give up living in a 3,000-square-foot house just outside the downtown core. He'd have to give up his 20-minute on-foot commute for what he figures would be "a considerable drive, at best." He'd have to start paying provincial tax. He'd see his current $1.15-per-litre gas prices rise to what he terms Vancouver's "insane" pump prices. And with Vancouver's salaries failing to keep pace with Calgary's oil-rich pay scale, he'd likely be looking at a pay cut to boot. Needless to say Roa is staying put in Calgary. He's turned down several offers from head hunters in Vancouver, and the BIV story includes recruiters who are having trouble luring educated and experienced workers to the city. In short, Vancouver is increasingly being seen as a no-go zone for top talent. This is very bad. Worse arguably than if house prices crashed. As Vancouver develops a reputation as a place where only the über-rich can afford to buy property, it could seriously undermine the economy. Fewer workers living here and earning good pay means a weaker income tax base for the province (though the city is benefiting from property taxes) not to mention less people with the means to shop, eat out and support local businesses and the arts. In addition, if you don't have a vibrant and enterprising population, chances are new companies won't get started. Coupled with the scarcity and high costs of commercial real estate, more companies are likely to move their head offices away. Earlier this month mining giant BHP Billiton shifted its Canadian head offices from Vancouver, a self-proclaimed global mining capital, to Saskatchewan. Who knows how many businesses decided not to come in the first place. Above all, if the economy is left weakened by departing head offices and a scarcity of talented workers, it will leave Vancouver even more vulnerable to that housing crash when it eventually comes. In economics Dutch Disease refers to countries that are overly dependent on their natural resources at the expense of other industries. Only here the culprit is real estate. Call it the Vancouver Virus. ca.finance.yahoo.com [Johnny: There are a lack of economic drivers here in Vancouver right now. The HST has meant less disposable income. Restaurants have been hurting indicating less people are eating out. Housing and condo prices are up though after a few soft winter months. People forget that prices at the high end of the market fell 50% in the 1980's. Interest rates were sky high then, but it is all relative as low interest rates mean a 1 percent move is about a 25 percent increase in the monthly mortagage payment for some people. Given that salary increase have been muted and illegal suite will not absorb that type of increase, a world of hurt might be coming. Foote talked about the changes due to demographic trends. A move by baby boomer to downside in 2015 when the bulk of them start to retire might add to the misery.]