Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (615621)	6/10/2011 7:41:03 AM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579310

Al, you're right. Next time I won't bother pointing out to you the dumbass things you like to say. ok, so what was your point? That Obama could have vetoed the entire extension of the tax cut? Well, the consequence of that was what? The fragile economic recovery possibly takes another hit START goes up in smoke DADT is held up again The 9/11 victim fund is stopped again So I used the word "forced"...and you don't think he was forced? Radical in my opinion is the notion that he would have vetoed the tax cut only to face a more difficult choice later, with a hostile GOP congress calling for making the bush cuts PERMANENT...and of course all these other issues up in the air... I mean your point is purely theoretical nuancing...dumbass is the word you used? Al