SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: elmatador who wrote (75107)6/11/2011 4:32:36 AM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation  Respond to of 217752
 
Not necessarily: < meddling with other countries is bad for you. > If outright conquest and genocide is doable, it can be good. Maori tribes would attack each other and the winners would eat the losers and take over their women. That was the human norm for millions of years and is still how chimpanzees do it [other than the eating part].

With the advent of Christian thinking, and the mutual trade, voluntary interaction, private property, thinking and talent specialisation, way of life, those barbarian antecedents have faded though they come to the fore still, from time to time around the world, either by way of individual crime or geopolitical megalomania for 1000 year reichs.

Islamic Jihad did well because they freed the serfs from the yokes of their masters. Similarly, the British Empire did well because they brought common law and freedom from slavery. Maoris for example loved being served dinner instead of becoming dinner. But with hordes of British Subjects from around the empire crowding into England, they had to call it a day and pull up the drawbridge. It was great while it lasted to be a British Subject and be able to roam the planet [much of it anyway].

With Tradable Citizenship, such a situation, but more stable, could again be achieved.

Mqurice