Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (102861)	6/13/2011 5:10:35 PM
From: JeffreyHF	9 Recommendations Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 197280

And you feel qualified to qualitatively distinguish among sources and motivations for "good" PR? That's quite a talent, to say nothing of meaningless distinctions. P.S. Yes, I do read what you write. It's the source and significance of your complaint against today's NYT fluff piece that I fail to comprehend.

To: waitwatchwander who wrote (102861)	6/13/2011 6:32:50 PM
From: BDAZZ	9 Recommendations Respond to of 197280

>>Is it really a good idea to focus your investment thinking upon that which once was? << I read Jeffrey's post a couple of times and could not find where he stated or implied that one should focus investment thinking on the past. Why did you feel the need to use this disingenuous tactic, unless you really don't feel too good about your position either. Btw you criticize Qcom for not being in the IPad now, but according to you we should not focus on whose chips are in there now. So if Qcom is focusing on getting into future Apple products then we should all be invested in Qcom which we are, so why the criticism? What companies do you like for the future or wireless?