Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : DELL Thread For BULLS and BEARS! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: adad69 who wrote (185)	11/17/1997 2:20:00 AM
From: Ted Jackson	Respond to of 198

William, I can appreciate your comment about Clinton. I thought it was quite funny. As for the statement "If Iran wanted to take an offensive move against Iraq they would have done so a long time ago", I guess my arguement is that THEY DID! The two nations were at war for years and literally millions of lives were lost. Agreed: it would be tragic for the Arabs to have Mecca destroyed, however it is very possible for a nation to be at war with Iraq, yet preserve this site of great historical significance (ie, Desert Storm,Iran vs. Iraq) . If we had closed the trap on Saddam and his (relatively speaking) elite Republican Guard, there would be nobody left to prevent Iran from marching into Baghdad. Most of Iraq's army is composed of ethnic tribesmen forced into service...and we all saw their battle lust on TV with mile-long lines of surrenderers. SORRY for the side track, fellows. Would love to discuss this more... Always looking to learn new things. Ted

To: adad69 who wrote (185)	11/17/1997 12:11:00 PM
From: Paul van Wijk	Respond to of 198

William, >> Clinton has been one of the weakest presidents on foreign >> affairs and for the the lame duck president he should just >> keep trying to put his golf game back together. I saw him playing last week. Am I wrong or was his smile more fake than ever before. Paul