Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Sandstorm Gold -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: PaperPerson who wrote (486)	6/17/2011 2:36:37 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1133

snd.v - added some of the BMs/energy model this week [not today], no great hopes for it near-term but it's been six month building a base and will have it finished eventually, ssl went through much the same pattern, rewarded patience, and continues to Think you're probably right about the taint from that pumpster Stansberry, PP, but i had already let some ssl.wt go in the high .50s, peeled a bit of the common but don't want to be completely out ... a company like this won't be harmed for long by some third-party dickhead ... haven't had time to watch kidl's video there, on the weekend for sure, there are videos on the snd.v website too

To: PaperPerson who wrote (486)	6/18/2011 9:03:54 AM
From: kidl	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1133

Contrary to you and marcos I am not so sure what if any fallout will result from the (obviously self-seving) Stansberry promotion. Gotta give Stansberry some brownie points for picking SSL for their promo versus using some pie in the sky outfit. I decided against selling because 1) I only hold warrants (large LT core, small trading position) at a fairly low cost 2) I see SSL as undervalued even at the current valuation If a lot of dumb retail money jumped on this promo without much DD, your move was the correct one short term. We'll know in a few days ...