Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: arun gera who wrote (75288)	6/15/2011 6:58:55 PM
From: dvdw©	Respond to of 217588

Interesting. Never the less Arun Maurice has proved his point in this little tit for tat.

To: arun gera who wrote (75288)	6/16/2011 12:43:31 PM
From: Maurice Winn	1 Recommendation Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 217588

That's the fashionable point of view = that humans are all identical clones, needing only the right environmental context to be gender selected, talented and skilled, or not. Some people even allow that some nutritional input is desirable as well as the cultural inputs. <It is mostly cultural bias > But it's very unfashionable to think that DNA is destiny, though people are happy to think that crocodiles will behave in a fairly definite crocodilian way, that Welsh springer spaniels will know, by birth, how to be such a dog and that poodles know how to act like them and other dogs likewise have their stereotypical patterns, not all of which, or even most of which, are culturally determined. As I said, knowing myself quite well, I don't think even with 1 million of me that we'd be inventing relativity theory. But maybe you know better and can show that all people are the same. Mqurice