SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: riskyinvesting who wrote (152825)6/16/2011 2:22:15 PM
From: t4texas  Respond to of 206085
 
riskyinvesting, that is a TREMENDOUS article on energy and energy comparisons. i liked it very much, because it never takes a layman into the weeds. yet it gives substantive information people can relate to and understand. i have to send this article to some laymen and environ-mentals. i can only hope they read it, and i hope their reading comprehension is good. thanks for posting that!



To: riskyinvesting who wrote (152825)6/16/2011 7:26:33 PM
From: Jacob Snyder2 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 206085
 
re Understanding E = mc2 By William Tucker

Here's what he wrote in the WSJ on March 14:

If a meltdown does occur in Japan, it will be a disaster for the Tokyo Electric Power Company but not for the general public. Whatever steam releases occur will have a negligible impact. Researchers have spent 30 years trying to find health effects from the steam releases at Three Mile Island and have come up with nothing. With all the death, devastation and disease now threatening tens of thousands in Japan, it is trivializing and almost obscene to spend so much time worrying about damage to a nuclear reactor. online.wsj.com

A quick google search for articles by him, makes clear he is unable to see any problem with nuclear energy, or anything good with any alternative energy. Just another blind propagandist, posing as an "objective" "expert".