SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Big Dog's Boom Boom Room -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Eric who wrote (152909)6/17/2011 3:27:24 PM
From: Dennis Roth1 Recommendation  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 206084
 
Poland's Shale-Gas Dream Could Dramatically Change Continent's Energy Game
rferl.org

GDANSK, Poland -- Could Poland become Europe's energy powerhouse?

The idea seems patently absurd given that the country is dependent on outdated coal power and Russian gas imports to meet its domestic energy needs.

But in a field outside the northern Polish village of Lebien, 90 kilometers west of Gdansk, it's an idea people are taking very seriously. At first glance, it doesn't look like much: a fenced-in area, a rig, a small construction team.

But what matters is what is located 3 kilometers underground -- large deposits of shale gas. If these can be tapped and exploited, it could dramatically change Europe's energy equation, reducing the continent's dependence on Russian imports and thus eliminating a major source of Moscow's political influence over Europe.

The EU as a whole depends on Russia for 25 percent of its gas supplies. Poland is particularly vulnerable, with 65 percent of gas imports coming from Russia.

Karl De Mong is vice president of Realm Energy, one of 22 companies, mostly from the United States and Canada, which has been granted concessions for the exploration of shale gas in Poland.

"It is very possible that Poland could have gas on a large enough scale not only to displace Russian gas supplies but probably to displace coal-power generation as well,” De Mong says.

Biggest Reserves In Poland

So called "unconventional" gas supplies such as shale have grown from just 1 percent of U.S. domestic gas production a decade ago to roughly 20 percent today. The global shale-gas market in 2011 was worth $26.6 billion.

A recent report by the U.S. Energy Information Administration put the volume of technically recoverable shale gas in Europe at 17.5 trillion cubic meters. Poland is pinpointed as the country on the continent with the biggest reserves, with some 5.3 trillion cubic meters ready for immediate extraction.

Even if Poland can only extract 3 trillion cubic meters, analysts say, it would still have gas reserves of more than 200 times its annual consumption and more than 750 times the country’s current annual production.

Other European countries exploring shale gas include Austria, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom.

Poland has granted 68 concessions that cover some 30 to 40 percent of the country's territory. The areas to be explored stretch from the Baltic Sea coast in the north to the Ukrainian border region in the southeast.

Most of the companies have already completed seismic surveys of their parcels of land to find out if the sediment is thick enough to drill in. Six wells have been drilled to give a clearer picture of the potential reserves and recently some companies have started to break rock down below by pumping water in to see if the gas in the sediment can be freed.

According to some estimates, production could start in two years.

Dramatic Results

David Messina, the executive director of BasGas, another company that has concessions in Poland, says it isn't realistic to produce shale gas in all of those areas. But even if a fraction of them work out, he says, the results would be dramatic.

“It is really going to be dependent on the economics, which we really don’t have a good understanding of yet," Messina says. "But if even 50 percent of some of the projections are accurate, then certainly within five to 10 years, Poland could be a gas exporter.”

And that is a possibility that has generated excitement at the highest levels in Warsaw.

“We believe, of course, that shale gas is not a silver bullet for Polish energy or also European energy," says Katarzyna Kacperczyk, deputy director of the Polish Foreign Ministry's Department for Economic Policy. "However, we do believe that once the production of shale gas starts, it will play a role in the Polish and European energy mix.”

And as De Mong explains, the government in Warsaw has gone to great lengths to see to it that companies exploring for shale gas do not run into any undue bureaucratic roadblocks.

“One of the things that Poland has within its control that...[it is] trying to use as a lever is the business environment," De Mong says. "They are trying to make the business environment accommodating to get this off the ground.”

Expensive, And Harmful

Extracting shale gas, however, is very expensive, with drilling costs running six to 10 times higher than conventional oil and gas. Ecologists also say it is harmful to the environment.

Shale gas is produced through a process called hydraulic fracturing -- or fracking. The process releases natural gas from shale by blasting the rock with sand, water, and chemicals. -- creating cracks through which the gas flows.

The process produces wastewater laced with toxic substances, which has raised the ire of environmentalists worldwide. New York state recently imposing a moratorium on shale-gas drilling due to environmental concerns. In May, France also banned hydraulic fracturing.

Kacperczyk stresses that the companies will follow all Polish and European regulations.

“We have absolutely no signs for any negative impact on the environment," Kacperczyk says. "On the other hand, this is also a big responsibility on the side of the companies. As in every industry activity, shale gas needs to obey rules and regulations. Companies need to implement the rules and regulations.”

The questions surrounding the impact of shale-gas drilling on the environment have led several EU member states to question the practice altogether. In addition to the French ban, the British government is facing growing pressure to investigate the safety and environmental impact of hydraulic fracturing after fears that it could have triggered two small earthquakes in Lancashire.

At the same time, there is widespread suspicion that Russia is using its considerable lobbying clout in the EU to bog down shale-gas exploration and extraction with excessive regulations.

Kacperczyk says each EU member state should be free to determine its own energy set-up.

“I think France can decide also independently what type if energy mix is best for France," he says. "In this sense, Poland has also a right to decide what energy mix is best for Poland. We have a different economic situation and we have a different energy situation. There are no two countries in Europe that are completely alike. That is why it is so important to have this diversity. We don’t need to replace each other. We need to be complementary to each other, and in this sense we also understand the energy solidarity in Europe.”



To: Eric who wrote (152909)6/17/2011 3:34:28 PM
From: Dennis Roth  Respond to of 206084
 
Specialist Ed Reed: Shale Gas 'Has Been A Game Changer In North America'
rferl.org

June 17, 2011
Is the world on the cusp of a shale-gas revolution? Who will be the leaders in using this new technology? And what are the upsides and the downsides? For some answers, RFE/RL correspondent Bruce Pannier spoke to Ed Reed, senior editor at Scotland-based NewsBase Ltd., which tracks global energy developments.

RFE/RL: Shale gas has been called a "game changer." How accurate is that characterization?

Ed Reed: It's certainly been a game changer in North America. There were predictions in the early 2000s that by about this time, the U.S. would be a net importer of gas, [that] it would be taking a lot more LNG [liquid natural gas] and therefore [would] become more reliant on other countries.

The fact that the shale-gas boom has happened in such a way -- kind of coming to prominence in 2007-2008 -- has meant that now there's no LNG import planned for America. And in fact it's really now looking at exporting LNG. In addition, the U.S. is now the top producer of gas in the world. It overtook Russia in 2009, so it's really been very important for the U.S. and for North America.

RFE/RL: People have known about shale gas for some time, but it was too expensive previously to extract. Has the technology become better and so much cheaper, or is it the case that natural-gas prices have risen so much that recovering shale gas is now an economical venture? Or is it a combination of both?

Reed: It really is a combination of both. The technology allowing it to be produced viably was really a very recent invention. I think the turning point was really in 2001 or 2002 when Devon Energy, a U.S.-based company, bought another U.S.-based company called Mitchell Energy. Mitchell pioneered the process of fracking and Devon managed to combine this process with its horizontal drilling knowledge – the two key elements of shale-gas extraction. So really we only saw the fruits of this labor in the second half of that decade.

So really only in 2007 and 2008 did we suddenly see a massive increase in shale-gas production, and that's really why we know so little about it because it’s such a recent technology. It's now cheaper to produce the gas and in fact I've seen some calculations that some shale gas can be produced cheaper than conventional gas in America. That's still a hotly debated issue, but we are seeing extremely low prices in North America.

RFE/RL: Could you walk us through the steps needed to recover shale gas?

Reed: It starts off as a conventional process of looking for oil or gas – carrying out seismic [tests] and drilling. But once you've drilled your well -- and as I said, often this would be a horizontal well going sideways to the gas seam -- companies would then carry out the process called fracking, which involves pumping a lot of water down the well to physically break apart the rocks and free the gas trapped in this shale to allow it to flow to the surface.

Fracking generally takes about a week or 10 days and it consumes a lot of water. It’s something like 4 [million] to 19 million liters per day to frack a well, so this is clearly an interesting problem for arid regions.

Another thing that should be borne in mind when considering shale-gas drilling is that there are very high decline rates from these wells. So companies need to refrack old wells or drill new wells. So what we're seeing is a high amount of wells drilled on a small amount of land, which would obviously have knock-on impact when looking beyond America to more densely populated countries such as in Europe.

RFE/RL: Which countries in the world are currently developing this resource?

Reed: Because shale gas has been talked about so much, it's attracted a lot of attention from all over the world. I've spoken to officials from a number of countries who have shown eagerness in trying to develop this resource. A handful that spring to mind [include] Algeria, Argentina, Australia, China, Egypt, Hungary, Poland, South Africa. I've seen some reports that India is going to be working on a shale-gas bid in the near future. So really there are a lot of countries interested, but it's a long way to go yet.

RFE/RL: Which countries are wary of pursuing shale-gas extraction?

Reed: Particularly in Western Europe, we're seeing a lot of reticence about how best to go forward with it. Recently, there were some worries in the U.K. about a company drilling in the north that's raised some eyebrows, shall we say. The French, I think, have imposed a moratorium on [fracking] over concerns of groundwater contamination and various other issues.

So I don’t know of a place that's outright banned it, but I think we are seeing a push-back from countries and indeed even states in the U.S. We've seen worries from Pennsylvania and New York that this fracking process is leading to environmental problems and a lot of people are very worried about it. In fact, in the U.S., the Environmental Protection Agency is working on a study of the process at the moment and that should be very revealing when the results of that come out.

RFE/RL: Is the technology affordable for most countries or will this resource be reserved for industrialized nations that can fund it?

Reed: I think that is the key question: to what extent can these gains that have been seen in North America -- to the extent that it has been a shale-gas revolution -- to what extent can these be replicated? I think it's a very open question, and if I had the answer I'd probably be a very rich man.

If you look at the U.S., there are some quite clear reasons why the shale-gas boom has occurred. It’s the most explored country in the world, and there's a strong local market and group of companies and sort of a critical mass of technology that really allowed this to happen that I don’t think you really have in other parts of the world, at least to the same extent. Similarly, the question of mineral rights is probably going to be a very important one, especially when looking at how shale gas can be exported to Europe.

In the U.S., if you say own land in the Barnett shale [deposit in Texas] or the Marcellus [deposit] then you are eligible to receive money from these companies producing gas from your land. That isn’t the case in Europe. It's much more difficult because the state owns the mineral rights, so the state benefits from the production under your land if you have, say, farmland in the U.K. or Germany or Poland. So this is going to be a key problem in terms of deterring people from agreeing to let people operate on their lands and that's going to be one to watch, I think. That's going to be a real problem.

Another reason that progress has happened so rapidly in the U.S. is that there are more lax environmental standards, and I think now looking at places like France, which has imposed this moratorium on hydraulic fracturing, that's going to be a problem as well. I think knowing what we know and looking at the American example, it's going to be very hard to carry out the same level of processes at the same intensity.