To: Brumar89 who wrote (15492 ) 6/25/2011 10:19:55 AM From: T L Comiskey Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300 My source for information is none other than..Dr Paul Crutzen.. Max Plank Institute very much..awarded and lettered.. ................................................ re...trace elements.. ozone...is 40 parts per million...in the upper atmosphere and yet..when man made cfcs are mixed in... the protecting layer of ozone is depleted and skin cancer..breaks out... just the facts ................................ water vapor.. evaporates.... how...??..../ by warming the oceans US Supreme Court ruling backs EPA on controlling CO2 emissions London, 21 June 2011: The US Supreme Court has reiterated its finding that CO2 is an air pollutant subject to control under the Clean Air Act and has backed the EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) to regulate the greenhouse gas. In an unanimous 8-0 ruling the justices denied environmentalists and states the right to sue power plants saying it is the EPA's job. The Supreme Court by reversing the ruling of a lower court in the American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut case reaffirmed its stand it had taken in 2007 in the Massachusetts v. EPA case. In 2007 the Supreme Court had given EPA the authority to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. "It is altogether fitting that Congress designated an expert agency, here, EPA, as best suited to serve as primary regulator of greenhouse gas emissions," Justice Ruth Ginsburg wrote. "The expert agency is surely better equipped to do the job than individual district judges issuing ad hoc, case-by-case injunctions." The electric utilities in question are TVA, American Electric Power Co., Duke Energy, Southern Co. and Excel Energy. Together, the utilities emit about 650 million tons of carbon dioxide each year, or 10 percent of the nation’s total.